Labor, Liberal and Big Pharma – The Conflicts of Interest Surrounding Australian Politics

Written by Bernie Smith

It is important that we get the following story out. It shows that we might have been infiltrated by the pharmaceutical industry at a high political level. They don’t need to donate money to parties legally when they own the people in power. But do they?  Judge for yourself…

Australia’s political landscape is dominated by two parties. Labour and the Liberals have a firm grip on Australia’s policy development. This is a dangerous precedent when we know that a few people in the top echelons of these parties have a massive influence on policies that make and shape Australia nowadays.

Australia has become a country at the forefront of depleting human rights in regards to health choices. Under the disguise of public health and the greater good, Australia has pushed for policies that have removed the importance of informed consent. And have taken away rights of patients and parents. Australia is one of the first places in the world where coercion, manipulation, and financial blackmail are a part of the national policies in regards to vaccines.

The media has taken it upon itself to not ask any questions and push the agenda towards mandatory vaccination. With articles that paint “anti-vaxxers” as child abusers and even child killers being printed in some of the main news publications in the country. The media landscape in Australia was largely dominated by two companies as well. With tMurdoch-owned NewsCorp being the main player. Rupert Murdoch has been pushing for the mandatory vaccination program through his news outlets and television stations. He has no interest to stop this draconian policy from expanding and has been actively pushing for it.

Let’s have a look at the prime minister of Australia, the leader of the Liberals. Malcolm Turnbull. He has previously admitted having some of his extensive wealth invested in different pharmaceutical companies. But more disturbing his wife, Lucy, is the chairman at Prima Biomed. An international company that develops cancer and autoimmune vaccinations.  Anyone of these products could be worth billions if picked up in national vaccine programs around the world.

So is it a conflict of interest to have her husband pushing for mandatory vaccination and implementing laws that stop people from receiving benefits if their kids aren’t fully vaccinated? You judge for yourself. But at the least, we can see that it raises questions. Questions that have never been raised by the media in Australia, but are very important as it is directly effecting the policy that depletes people’s basic rights in regards to medical freedom. The right to choose medical intervention. You are, as was established in the Nuremberg code, allowed to deny medical treatment for personal reasons. And this shouldn’t be done with coercion, manipulation or financial penalty. But these new laws have violated the Nuremberg code without anyone raising an eyebrow.

At the head of the Labour party stands Bill Shorten. He is married to Chloe Shorten, born as Chloe Bryce. Chloe is the daughter of Quentin Bryce who was the Governor-General of Australia between 2008 and 2014. Quentin Bryce, while Governor-General, was in the background when two Labour leaders were pushed out of the top position. Did it have anything to do with her son-in-law being the next in line? We will probably never know for sure. But again, it raises questions.

Chloe Shorten has 2 brothers and 2 sisters. Thomas or Tom Bryce being one of them. He has worked his way up at the top management levels of GlaxoSmithKlein in Australia. Thomas Bryce is the National Channel Manager for Vaccines. Maybe just another coincidence. But who knows it might have something to do with his family connections.

Thomas Bryce, according to his Linkedin page, has the past in the record industry. Working as a sales manager for a few different record labels and festival organizers. This isn’t really anything relevant if it wasn’t for him moving into a sales job at GSK in 2005. He worked his way up into a leading position in regards to vaccines. Does this have anything to do with his family’s influential ties? Does this have anything to do with the push for Shorten to become the Labour leader? Who knows. But it does raise many questions of conflict of interest and it makes people wonder if the leader of the Labour party might have some darker motives in regards to his vaccine policy.

Do your own research. Look at the shaming and bullying from the media towards people and families that just want a choice in regard to their children. Ask yourself if people should be allowed to decide that they want natural approaching regards to their children’s health.

Why can’t the medical establishment and their followers accept a safety commission into vaccines?  Why are they fighting to stop the debate in regards to vaccines? All questions that raise much more. And all together with the conflicts of interest outlined here, it shows that we might be looking at a massive conspiracy. A controlled system to sell us mandatory drugs that might make us sicker and will enrich the pharmaceutical and medical establishment even more.

Just be aware when the push for the next vaccine, or the adult mandate comes along…..

DISCLAIMER – This story is mostly based on the opinion of the writer. 

15 Responses

  1. Bill says:

    A good article. But just one suggestion. The word “regard” must not be pluralised. The terms “in regards” or “with regards” are both incorrect. It should be “with regard to” or “regarding such and such”.
    This is such a common error that even seasoned journalists make from time to time.

    • admin says:

      Thanks for the tip.

    • Lord Roger Lowrey says:

      Are you serious this mega important subject and all you can focus on is a spelling mistake. You reallly need to get therapy.

      • admin says:

        That’s all they got to justify in their heads that they continue to support vaccines. They have to debunk all this in some way. Really I just feel pity for these people….

  2. Nicola says:

    I think you meant to say ‘without coercion’ (paragraph 6).
    Interesting information though and I believe these are concerning conflicts of interest.

  3. Tracy says:

    Thank you for this information, all very relevant points and definitely food for thought.
    Just one thing I should mention, I think you have a little (big) typo. 6th paragraph down “You are, as was established in the Nuremberg code, allowed to deny medical treatment for personal reasons. And this should be done with coercion, manipulation or financial penalty”………….Really??

  4. S H says:

    Can I inject your infant with:
    Ovalbumin, human serum albumin, bovine albumin, aluminium hydroxide, aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate, aluminium phosphate, aluminium potassium sulfate, amino acids, ammonium sulfate, amphotericin B, ascorbic acid, bactopeptone, beta propiolactone, benzethonium chloride, brilliant green dye, calcium carbonate, calcium chloride, chlortetracycline, cystine, dextran, DNA, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle Medium, ethylenediamine- tetraacetic acid sodium, egg protein, ferric (III) nitrate, formaldehyde-formalin, gelatin, genetamicin, glucose glutamine, glutaraldehyde, glycerin, glycine, histidine, hydrochloric acid, hydrocortisone, lactose, magnesium stearate, magnesium sulfate, monosodium glutamate, mouse serum protein, MRC-5 cellular protein (aborted fetal cell line), neomycin, phenol, phenol red, 2-phenoxyethanol, phosphate buffers (eg. Disodium, monosodium, potassium, sodium dihydrogenphosphate), polydimethylsilozone, polymyxin B, polyoxyethylene9-10 nonyl phenol, polyoxyethelated octyl phenol, polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80, potassium chloride, potassium glutamate, bovine calf serum, sodium acetate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, sodium deoxycholate, sodium hydrogenocarbonate, sodium hydroxide, sodium phosphate, sodium pyruvate, sorbitol, streptomycin, sucrose, Thimerosal [49.6% ethylmercury], tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, tyrosine, urea, vitamins unspecified, xanthan, and yeast protein that are used to manufacture vaccines grown on the following production media: bovine protein, calf skin, chick kidney cells, chicken embryo, Cohen-Wheeler modified (pertussis components), human diploid tissue culture-MRC-5 and WI-38 [aborted fetal cell lines], Lathan medium derived from bovine casein, Linggoud-Fenton medium containing extract, Medium 199 (including amino acids, vitamins, sucrose, phosphate, glutamate, human albumin, fetal bovine serum), minimum essential medium (including amino acids, vitamins, fetal bovine serum, human albumin), monkey kidney tissue culture-Vero (Vervet or African green monkeys), mouse brain culture (SMB), Mueller-Hinton agar medium, Mueller-Miller medium, Puziss-Wright medium 1095, Rhesus [monkey] fetal lung tissue culture, Stainer-Scholte medium, soy peptone broth [probable GMO product], synthetic/semi-synthetic [what that exactly is, is not defined! Nanoparticles?], Watson-Scherp medium, yeast or yeast extract (typically Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Rubber particles, Latex, Monkey Viruses, Foreign proteins, Peanut Oil, Pol, Horse blood, Rabbit brain, Dog kidney, Monkey kidney, Chick embryo, Duck egg, Pig blood, Porcine (pig) protein/tissue, Dog kidney cells-Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK), Mouse Brain- inactivated mouse brain (IMB),JE virus (Beijing-1), Diploid and Continuous cell lines,
    (PERC6, HEK-293). Baculovirus, Serum From Aborted Calf Fetus Blood, Cells From Armyworms-ExpresSF+ Cells, Antifreeze, Lead, Cadmium, Antibiotics, Acetone..
    I will warn you that most of your vaccines are made in China.
    I will not be held liable and the manufacturer not accountable if something were to go wrong.
    The NVCIP Has paid out over 3.5 billion dollars in compensation for injuries and death.
    There are 8,000 different adverse vaccine reactions listed in the complete CDC’s VAERS database –
    “None of these have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or their potential to impair fertility.”
    The long-term risks to human health of injecting infants, children and adults with human protein/DNA have never been studied.
    None of these have been evaluated for their combined (synergistic toxicity)
    I warn you that Cell cultured products can transmit infectious agents.
    We have no double blind placebo controlled studies on this mandated schedule.
    We have no scientific studies in infants, children or adults to help us understand the nature of the progression of TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune responses to any of the injected materials in vaccines.

  5. Jaye says:

    WOW Scary. Both the article and also the post above.
    Quite sickening really and wondering where this trajectory will slide down to in terms of our human rights

  6. Walter says:

    “Mandatory vaccination is a problem because, as Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull admitted to the media, he and his wife “work very much as a team” to accomplish their various agendas. In the case of vaccinations, this means supporting legislation and mandates that require people to be vaccinated, even against their will, which has the effect of padding both pharmaceutical profits and their personal portfolios.

    Australia’s politicians are deeply tied to pharmaceutical corporations, the British Monarchy, and other corporate and institutional powers which threaten the freedom and prosperity of Australian citizens,” explains The Mind Unleashed.”

    It’s no different in the U.S. The only thing stopping corrupt politicians from legislating mandatory vaccination for all American children and adults right now is Donald Trump. That’s not public health policy—that’s Medical Mafia corruption at its worst.

  7. Tim Koelewyn says:

    Watch the video series The Truth About Vaccines. It is a game changer. I have been against the unsafe vaccines for 21 years since my daughter had a severe reaction to Hib. At last the truth is coming out.

  1. 11/03/2017

    […] Source:… […]

  2. 12/03/2017

    […] a recent post by Truth Library entitled, Labor, Liberal and Big Pharma – The Conflicts of Interest Surrounding Australian Politics We find some very disturbing information about Bill shorten’s Brother In Law being a sales […]

  3. 19/05/2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *