Study Shows That Autism and Alluminium at Vaccine Levels ARE Connected – Vaccines Are NOT Safe!
New Canadian study: Autism-Aluminum adjuvant link corroborated
BY J.B. HANDLEY September 18, 2017
In the December 2017 issue of the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry and released online today, Dr. Christopher Shaw and colleagues at the University of British Columbia have established convincing biological evidence linking aluminum adjuvant used in vaccines to autism.
“This is the paper I have been waiting for. This paper reports measurements of cytokines in the brains of animals injected with aluminum adjuvant as neonates. The same cytokines are elevated as in human autism. IL-6 and CCL2/MCP-1 are elevated for example. Male animals are more strongly affected. It’s a perfect match to human autism.”
VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Just two weeks ago, I wrote about a study from France that raised major concerns about aluminum adjuvant used in vaccines. The French studyauthors wrote: “Concerns about its [aluminum adjuvant’s] safety emerged following recognition of its unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence within immune cells in some individuals, and reports of chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive dysfunction, myalgia, dysautonomia and autoimmune/inflammatory features temporally linked to multiple Al [aluminum]-containing vaccine administrations.”
In a nutshell, the French study found that when smaller doses of aluminum adjuvant were consistently injected over a short period of time — like during childhood vaccinations —the aluminum was more likely to end up in the brain, and the French scientists issued a stern warning about the use of aluminum adjuvant in vaccines:
In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation.
Canadian researchers establish direct link
In the December 2017 issue of the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry and released online today, Dr. Christopher Shaw and colleagues have established convincing biological evidence linking aluminum adjuvant to autism. The study’s title alone should cause concern for parents everywhere:
Subcutaneous injections of aluminum at vaccine adjuvant levels activate innate immune genes in mouse brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism
As the study authors state:
“It thus appears that Al [aluminum adjuvant] triggered innate immune system activation and altered cholinergic activity in male mice, observations which are consistent with those in autism. Female mice were less susceptible to Al exposure as only the expression levels of NF-κB inhibitor and TNFA were altered. Regional patterns of gene expression alterations also exhibited gender differences, as frontal cortex was the most affected area in males and cerebellum in females. Thus, Al adjuvant promotes brain inflammation and males appear to be more susceptible to Al′s toxic effects.”
It’s critical to note that the researchers found gender differences in how the mice responded, with male mice showing higher susceptibility, which is consistent with what we are seeing in autism: roughly 80% of the cases are boys.
The Canadian researchers included a diagram in their study that showed how aluminum adjuvant can contribute to an inflammatory cascade in the brain that leads to autism.
What does this mean in plain English?
Six months ago, I wrote an article about how close it appeared international scientists were to establishing a clear biological basis for how aluminum adjuvant can create autism. My article has been read more than 250,000 times, and I have heard from scientists from all over the world (most unwilling to let me quote them in public, which is its own great tragedy), including a scientist who has created a great website called Vaccine Papers. I asked “VP” about the importance of this study, and words were not minced:
This is the paper I have been waiting for.
This paper reports measurements of cytokines in the brains of animals injected with aluminum adjuvant as neonates. The same cytokines are elevated as in human autism. IL-6 and CCL2/MCP-1 are elevated for example. Male animals are more strongly affected. It’s a perfect match to human autism.
The paper includes a number of strong statements about vaccine causality.
This paper is hugely important because it shows IL-6 elevation in the brain, which of course provides a firm link to the immune activation literature. It is strong evidence supporting the al adjuvant IL-6 autism hypothesis.
A Clear Hypothesis
If you would like to understand this complex issue in greater detail, I hope you will consider reading my widely read article from six months ago:
BY J.B. HANDLEY February 22, 2017healthcareinamerica.us
For the sake of brevity, here are the four key scientific discoveries I discussed in this lengthy article, most of which has happened in the last thirty-six months, appearing to show a clear link between aluminum adjuvant from vaccines and autism.
Discovery #1: “Maternal Immune Activation” can cause autism
Studies that support Discovery #1:
- Pregnancy, Immunity, Schizophrenia, and Autism.
2. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism
3. Microglial Activation in Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder
4. Maternal Immune Activation Alters Fetal Brain Development through Interleukin-6
5. Activation of the Maternal Immune System During Pregnancy Alters Behavioral Development of Rhesus Monkey Offspring
6. Brain IL-6 elevation causes neuronal circuitry imbalances and mediates autism-like behaviors
Some helpful quotes from the above research to help contextualize Discovery #1:
“As we learn more about the connections between the brain and the immune system, we find that these seemingly independent networks of cells are, in fact, continually talking to each other. As an adult, the activation of your immune system causes many striking changes in your behavior — increased sleep, loss of appetite, less social interaction — and, of course, headaches. Conversely, stress in your life (as perceived by your brain) can influence immune function — the brain regulates immune organs, such as the spleen, via the autonomic nervous system.
Recent evidence shows that this brain-immune conversation actually starts during the development of the embryo, where the state of the mother’s immune system can alter the growth of cells in the fetal brain. As we shall see, such alterations can lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia or autism in the offspring.” — Dr. Paul Patterson, CalTech
“There is also very striking evidence of immune dysregulation in the brain itself. Just last year, a group led by Carlos Pardo at Johns Hopkins found what they’re calling a “neural inflammation” in postmortem examination of brains of patients with autism who died between the ages of eight and 44 years. But these people weren’t infected — they died of such things as drowning or heart attacks. The study found that the microglial cells, which act as the brain’s own immune system, were activated. The study also found amazing increases of certain cytokines in the brain, and of others in the cerebro- spinal fluid. This is is a landmark paper, in my opinion. It presents the first evidence that there’s an ongoing, permanent immune-system activation in the brains of autistic people. It’s a subclinical state, because there’s no overt infection. But it’s there.” — Dr. Paul Patterson, CalTech
“In conclusion, the present PET measurements revealed marked activation of microglia in multiple brain regions of young adults with ASD. The results strongly support the contention that immune abnormalities contribute to the etiology of ASD.” — Dr. Carlos Pardo, Johns Hopkins
“Cytokines are produced by the white blood cells, and their levels in the blood increase when we get an infection…We think that maternal immune activation alters brain circuits…there’s that permanent, subclinical, altered immune state in the autistic brain — those increased cytokine levels…are they [cytokines] actually interacting with the brain in an ongoing fashion, with consequences visible in the patients’ behavior? I favor [the cytokine] hypothesis.” — Dr. Paul Patterson, CalTech
“Here we show that the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is critical for mediating the behavioral and transcriptional changes in the offspring. A single maternal injection of IL-6 on day 12.5 of mouse pregnancy causes prepulse inhibition (PPI) and latent inhibition (LI) deficits in the adult offspring.” — Dr. Paul Patterson, CalTech
“In this rhesus monkey model, MIA yields offspring with abnormal repetitive behaviors, communication, and social interactions. These results extended the findings in rodent MIA models to more human-like behaviors resembling those in both autism and schizophrenia.” — UC Davis MIND Institute
“In summary, our study supports a critical role of IL-6 elevation in modulating autism-like behaviors through impairments on synapse formation, dendritic spine development, as well as on neuronal circuit balance. These findings suggest that manipulation of IL-6 may be a promising avenue for therapeutic interventions.” —Dr. Xiaohong Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Discovery #2: Aluminum Adjuvant causes immune activation and is far more neurotoxic than previously thought
Studies that support Discovery #2:
- Aluminum Adjuvant Linked to Gulf War Illness Induces Motor Neuron Death in Mice
- Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration
- Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations
- Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain
5. Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines
6. Non-linear dose-response of aluminium hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective low dose neurotoxicity
Some helpful quotes from the above research to help contextualize Discovery #2:
“In addition, the continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines (i.e., Hepatitis A and B, DPT, and so on) for the general public may have even more widespread health implications. Until vaccine safety can be comprehensively demonstrated by controlled long-term studies that examine the impact on the nervous system in detail, many of those already vaccinated as well as those currently receiving injections may be at risk in the future. Whether the risk of protection from a dreaded disease outweighs the risk of toxicity is a question that demands urgent attention.” — Dr. Christoper Shaw, University of British Columbia
“Overall, the results reported here mirror previous work that has clearly demonstrated that aluminum, in both oral and injected forms, can be neurotoxic. Potential toxic mechanisms of action for aluminum may include enhancement of inflammation (i.e., microgliosis)…” — Dr. Christoper Shaw, University of British Columbia
“…it is somewhat surprising to find that in spite of over 80 years of use, the safety of Al adjuvants continues to rest on assumptions rather than scientific evidence.For example, nothing is known about the toxicology and pharmacokinetics of Al adjuvants in infants and children…Yet, in spite of these observations children continue regularly to be exposed to much higher levels of Al adjuvants than adults, via routine childhood vaccination programmes.” — Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, University of British Columbia
“However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier…” —Dr. Josette Cadusseau, Université Paris
“Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety.” — Dr. Josette Cadusseau, Université Paris
“We conclude that Alhydrogel [aluminum adjuvant] injected at low dose in mouse muscle may selectively induce long-term Al cerebral accumulation and neurotoxic effects. To explain this unexpected result, an avenue that could be explored in the future relates to the adjuvant size since the injected suspensions corresponding to the lowest dose, but not to the highest doses, exclusively contained small agglomerates in the bacteria-size range known to favour capture and, presumably, transportation by monocyte-lineage cells. In any event, the view that Alhydrogel neurotoxicity obeys ‘the dose makes the poison’ rule of classical chemical toxicity appears overly simplistic.” —Dr. Romain K. Gherardi, Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC)
“In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation.” — Dr. Romain K. Gherardi, Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC)
Discovery #3: Aluminum can increase IL-6 in the brain
Studies that support Discovery #3:
- Neuroprotective Effect of Nanodiamond in Alzheimer’s Disease Rat Model: a Pivotal Role for Modulating NF-κB and STAT3 Signaling
2. Brain IL-6 elevation causes neuronal circuitry imbalances and mediates autism-like behaviors
Some helpful quotes from the above research to help contextualize Discovery #3:
“The results also showed that aluminum administration increased the hippocampus pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α by 3.8-fold, IL-6 by 4-fold, and iNOS by 3.8-fold compared to the normal control group.” —Dr. Mosaad A. Abdel-Wahhab, Cairo University
Most vaccines contain aluminum, and aluminum is a proven neurotoxin, in amounts received from vaccines. Vaccines in combination can result in toxic aluminum overload. Even the aluminum in a single vaccine can be harmful because the aluminum is in a form that is more dangerous than ingested aluminum. Specifically, vaccine aluminum is in nanoparticulate form, which is harder for the body to eliminate, and because it is transported around the body differently than ingested aluminum.
It is natural and normal to ingest small doses of aluminum from food and water. Its not good for you, but the body has adequate defenses. Absorption of ingested Al is low, about 0.3%, so about 99.7% is eliminated in feces. Ingested aluminum is in ionic form (individual charged atoms), which is readily removed by the kidneys. Also, ionic aluminum is blocked from entering the brain by the blood brain barrier. The low absorption, rapid elimination by the kidneys and barrier to brain entry adequately protects the brain from aluminum.
However, nanoparticulate aluminum from vaccines cannot be removed by the kidneys. The particles are far too large to be filtered out by the kidneys. The Al nanoparticles do dissolve slowly (converting to ionic aluminum). But long before they can dissolve completely, the Al nanoparticles are “eaten” by immune system cells called macrophages. In other words, the particles wind up inside the macrophages. Once loaded with the Al nanoparticles, the macrophages spread aluminum as they travel through the body. This is dangerous, because the Al-loaded macrophages carry Al nanoparticles to tissues (e.g. the brain) that are damaged by very small amounts of aluminum. — Vaccine Papers
“Here we show that mice with elevated IL-6 in the brain dis- play many autistic features, including impaired cognitive abilities, deficits in learning, abnormal anxiety traits and habituations, as well as decreased social interactions. IL-6 elevation caused alterations in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic formations and disrupted the balance of excitatory/inhibitory synaptic transmissions. IL-6 elevation also resulted in an abnormal change in the shape, length and distributing pattern of dendritic spines. These findings suggest that IL-6 elevation in the brain could mediate autistic-like behaviors, possibly through the imbalances of neural circuitry and impairments of synaptic plasticity.” —Dr. Xiaohong Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Discovery #4: Hepatitis B vaccine induces IL-6 in postnatal rats
Studies that support Discovery #4:
[Author’s note: This fourth discovery was really the subject of my extensive article, because it discussed a new paper that seemed to tie everything together. The Canadian paper above ties everything together even more tightly.]
- Neonatal vaccination with bacillus Calmette–Guérin and hepatitis B vaccines modulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats
Some helpful quotes from the above research to help contextualize Discovery #4:
“An important new study by Li et al. reports the effects of bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) vaccine (for tuberculosis) and hepatitis B vaccine on brain development in infant rats. The study relates the observed brain changes to the type of immune activation (Th1 or Th2, explained below) stimulated by the vaccines. The BCG and hep B vaccines had opposite effects on the brain (BCG being beneficial, and hep B being detrimental), and a combination of both vaccines resulted in cancellation of the effects.
This is the first study to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination on brain development. All other studies of immune activation have used essentially pathological conditions that mimic infection and induce a strong fever. A criticism I have heard often from vaccine advocates is that the immune activation experiments are not relevant to vaccines because vaccines cause a milder immune activation than injections of poly-IC or lipopolysaccharide (two types of immune system activators).
This new study demonstrates that vaccines can affect brain development via immune activation. Hence, the immune activation experiments are relevant to vaccines…The hep B vaccine increased IL-6 in the hippocampus (the only brain region analyzed for cytokines).” — Vaccine Papers
Four discoveries, a clear path to autism
Here’s a simple graphic that I think spells out the process of triggering autism very clearly, as demonstrated by the published science I have shared with you above through the four discoveries.
The new Canadian study, just published, makes these findings even more clear, and more robust, and provides even greater detail into HOW aluminum adjuvant leads to autism.
When I published my article back in February, I heard from scientists from all over the world. I heard from pediatricians. I heard from board members at Autism Speaks. Many agreed with me: this was disturbing and important work, and it may well describe where all this autism is coming from. What’s happened since that time? Nothing.
There’s no mechanism for reviewing or putting all this published science together. The scientists doing this great work are perpetually nervous that they will lose their funding source or get “Wakefielded.” There’s no group responsible for putting all these published scientists in a room and figuring out what we do about this giant mess, and what all this information means. Every minute, a new child is diagnosed with autism, and every minute, it strikes me that autism may be completely AVOIDABLE. If you’re reading this, all I can ask is that you share the information widely, and that if you happen to be in a position of influence, please help save our kids.
In my opinion, we are much, much closer to understanding how autism has been triggered in so many children, and I hope this article is another step on the path to the truth. And, for so many of you out there doing everything you can to help you son or daughter with autism live the best possible life, perhaps a clearer understanding of how their autism was triggered will improve their chances for recovery.
For those of you interested in hearing from Dr. Shaw directly, here’s a video excerpt (just under 2 minutes) from the movie The Greater Good where Dr. Shaw discusses an earlier study he and his colleagues conducted looking at aluminum adjuvant (Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration):
Subcutaneous injections of aluminum at vaccine adjuvant levels activate innate immune genes in mouse brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism
Upon peripheral injection, aluminum activates the nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-κB) pathway in the brain, resulting in the release of proinflammatory molecules. The increased immunoinflammatory signal downregulates the activity of acetylcholinesterase to activate acetylcholine-mediated immunosuppression. If immunosuppression is not achieved, the excessive immunoinflammatory response may impair neurodevelopmental processes producing autistic pathology.
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by impairment in social interaction, verbal communication and repetitive/stereotypic behaviors [1,2]. A growing body of scientific literature shows that general immune dysfunction including various neuroimmune abnormalities (i.e., abnormal cytokine profiles, neuroinflammation and presence of autoantibodies against brain proteins) are key pathological biomarkers in ASD patients [3–15]. Other key characteristics of autistic brains include abnormal neural connectivity [16–19], decreased number of cerebellar Purkinje cells [20–22], small cell size and increased cell packing density at all ages in the limbic system (the hippocampus, amygdala and entorhinal cortex) suggesting a curtailment in normal neuronal development .
It is also generally acknowledged that ASDs are complex disorders resulting from the combination of genetic and environmental factors with multiple gene–gene and gene–environmental interactions, although there is still uncertainty about the exact proportions of each component . Moreover, the molecular mechanisms of these gene-environmental interactions which result in autistic pathology remain to be discovered. Aluminum (Al) is an environmental toxin with demonstrated negative impact on human health, especially the nervous system, to which humans are regularly exposed. In particular, Al can enter the human body through various sources including food, drinking water, cosmetic products, cooking utensils and pharmaceutical products including antacids and vaccines [24–33]. In addition, Al is also present in many infant formulas . However, compared to dietary Al of which only ~ 0.25% is absorbed into systemic circulation, Al from vaccines may be absorbed at over 50% efficiency in the short term  and at nearly 100% efficiency long-term . Thus, vaccine-derived Al has a much greater potential to produce toxic effects in the body than that obtained through diet. Nonetheless, even dietary Al has been shown to accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) over time, producing Alzheimer’s disease type outcomes in experimental animals fed equivalent amounts of Al to those humans consume through a typical Western diet [26,37].
Unlike dietary Al, Al used in vaccines is specifically designed to produce a long-lasting immune response, and, in this context, rapid excretion of the adjuvant would nullify the very reason it is put in vaccine formulations. Another reason for the observed long retention of Al adjuvants in bodily compartments (i.e., 8–10 years following injection) [38,39] is due to their tight association with the vaccine antigen or other vaccine excipients (i.e., contaminant deoxyribonucleic acid – DNA) . Notably, experiments in adult rabbits demonstrate that even in antigen-free form, the two predominant forms of approved and clinically used vaccine adjuvants, Al hydroxide and Al phosphate, are very poorly excreted. The cumulative amount of Al hydroxide and Al phosphate excreted in the urine of adult rabbits, as long as 28 days post intramuscular injection, was < 6% and 22% respectively as measured by accelerator mass spectrometry. It was also shown that within this timeframe, 17% of Al hydroxide and 51% of the Al phosphate was absorbed into the systemic circulation. In addition, the injected Al did not remain localized at the injection site but rather distributed to distant organs with highest amounts detected in the kidneys, followed by the spleen, liver, heart, lymph nodes and the brain . In summary, the study in rabbits showed that absorption following intramuscular Al particulate injections into the blood is not instantaneous, and only some of the Al was absorbed from the injection depot over the first 28 days. These data are supported by the Khan et al.  study suggesting that the initial trajectory for Al hydroxide from the muscle is into the lymphatic system carried by circulating macrophages. In particular, in a series of experiments, the French group showed that Al injected in vaccine-relevant amounts into 8–10 week old mice (mimicking the amount that adult humans receive through vaccinations) is able to travel to distant organs including the spleen and the brain, where it can be detected one year after injection. The translocation of Al into the brain is dependent on the phagocytic macrophages which engulf the Al particles and carry them to the draining lymph nodes and thereafter across the blood-brain barrier, in a Trojan-horse like mechanism. This translocation is facilitated by a leaky blood-brain barrier as it was initially observed to occur in C57BL/6 mdx mouse strain (with leaky blood brain barrier) . Subsequently however, it was also observed to occur in wild type mouse strains such as the CD-1 strain  which was also the model used in our study. Moreover, the subcutaneously injected Al appears to travel much faster to the brain than intramuscularly injected Al. Notably while no brain translocation of Al was observed by day 270 post-injection in CD-1 mice, subcutaneous injection showed early brain translocation at day 45 post Al-injection, at a dose of 200 μg Al/kg .
Collectively, these findings refute the notion that adjuvant nanoparticles remain localized and act through a “depot effect”. On the contrary, Al derived from vaccine formulations can cross the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers and incite immunoinflammatory responses in neural tissues [43–46]. These observations led Khan et al.  to suggest that repeated doses of Al hydroxide may be “insidiously unsafe”, especially in closely-spaced immune challenges presented to an infant or a person with damaged blood-brain or cerebrospinal fluid barriers . The problem with vaccine-derived Al is thus twofold: it drives a prolonged immune response even in the absence of a viral or bacterial threat and, it can make its way into various organ systems producing untoward effects. Some of the toxic actions of Al on the nervous system include: disruption of synaptic activity, misfolding of crucial proteins, promotion of oxidative stress, activation of microglia and the induction of neuroinflammatory responses [24,28,33,45,47,48]. Moreover, by its ability to stimulate macrophages to produce pro-inflammatory mediators [49,50], Al may trigger systemic inflammatory responses. Altogether, these observations show that the adjuvant form of Al has a unique potential to induce neuroimmune disorders, including those of the autism spectrum.
Given that infants worldwide are regularly exposed to Al adjuvants through routine pediatric vaccinations, it seemed warranted to reassess the neurotoxicity of Al in order to determine whether Al may be considered as one of the potential environmental triggers involved in ASD.
In order to unveil the possible causal relationship between behavioral abnormalities associated with autism and Al exposure, we initially injected the Al adjuvant in multiple doses (mimicking the routine pediatric vaccine schedule) to neonatal CD-1 mice of both sexes. The amount of the adjuvant was the equivalent to what children receive during the pediatric vaccination visits in their first year of life. The doses injected (Table 1) were also comparable to the dose used by the French group (200 μg Al/kg) in their experiment which demonstrated early brain translocation of Al adjuvant in adult 8 week old CD-1 mice following subcutaneous injection , the same route of exposure used by us. At six months of age, our male and female mice injected with Al in the early post-natal period, exhibited a range of altered behaviors .
|Treatment group||Mouse age (days postnatal)||Total Al injected
(ug/kg body weight)
In autism, the adverse neurobehavioral alterations are presumed to reflect underlying alterations in CNS structure and/or function. In the present study, those previously observed adverse behavioral outcomes appear to be confirmed at the molecular level. We detected an excessive activation of inflammatory factors in specific brain areas as a result of Al-injection both in male and female mice, though males were more severely affected. Our results are consistent with the observed male susceptibility bias in ASD . Furthermore, the present findings underscore the well-established intrinsic connection between excessive immune stimulation (in our case induced by Al) and subsequent alteration of normal neurodevelopmental pathways, thus substantiating the notion that immunological alterations during critical periods of early development play a crucial role in the pathology of neurobehavioral disorders including those of the autism spectrum [4,9,53–56].
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals and breeding
Previous studies in our laboratory showed behavioral and motor deficits in CD-1 mice following Al adjuvant injection and thus for comparison purposes this same strain was chosen [44,45,51]. Male and female CD-1 breeders were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, MA). All animals were housed at the Jack Bell Research Centre Animal Care Facility in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Females and males were housed separately (apart from for breeding purposes) at no more than five animals per cage and at an ambient temperature of 22 °C and a 12/12 h light cycle. All mice were fed Purina mouse chow and water ad libitum. For the purposes of breeding, three female and three male mice of 16 weeks of age were housed together (total of four cages of breeders). Following impregnation, males were removed from the breeder’s cage and housed separately and the females were monitored for the parturition date, which was taken as postnatal day (PND) 0. After birth, the pups from the four litters were distributed at PND3, so that each litter consisted of 14 pups. Injections were started at PND3 (Table 1). All mice were weaned at PND35 (five postnatal weeks) and were kept housed at three to five animals per cage until the end of the experiment. Mice were weighed every two days until they were 10 weeks of age and from then on they were weighed once a week. At 16 weeks of age the mice were euthanized and the brain tissues were collected for gene expression profiling experiments. The brain samples of five males and five females injected with Al and five males and five female control mice were randomly paired for gene expression profiling. One half of the brain sample from each mouse was used for semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses, and the other half was used for Western blotting. The brain samples of five mice from each group were used for brain region-specific gene expression profiling. The experiments for each mouse were repeated three times for statistical purposes. All experimental procedures on animals were approved by the University of British Columbia (UBC)’s Animal Care Committee (protocol #A11-0042) and were in compliance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care regulations and guidelines.
2.2. Aluminum adjuvant
Alhydrogel®, an Al hydroxide (Al(OH)3) gel suspension, was used as a source of Al hydroxide. Alhydrogel is manufactured by Superfos Biosector a/s (Denmark) and was purchased from SIGMA Canada. Al hydroxide and Al phosphate are the two most commonly used adjuvants in clinically approved vaccines, although they differ in physicochemical properties as well as cytotoxicity . In order to be able to make valid comparisons, we opted to use Al hydroxide as this is the form we used in our previous work [44,45,51].
2.3. Dosage and administration
We sought to mimic the U.S. vaccination schedules as closely as practically possible in our mouse model . For this purpose, CD-1 mouse pups were divided in two groups: the U.S. vaccination schedule group, and saline control, each consisting of 5 males and 5 females. Since most pediatric vaccinations are given to children before the age of 2 years, we spread out the schedule of Al injections over the first three postnatal weeks which approximately corresponds to a human equivalent of 0–2 years of age (Table 1). The dosages of Al adjuvant administered to mice were approximately equivalent (μg/kg) to those administered to children in the U.S. The U.S. schedule received six injection of Al hydroxide (at 170, 150, 110, 80, 20 and 20 μg/kg body weight respectively), for a total of 550 μg/kg body weight (Table 1). The treated mice were injected subcutaneously into the loose skin behind the neck (the “scruff”) to minimize discomfort and for the ease of injection. We recognize that most pediatric vaccines are administered intramuscularly, but we aimed to follow as closely as possible the conditions of previous studies from our laboratory [44,45,51] in order to be able to make valid comparisons. Mice up to 12 days postnatal were injected with a micro-needle while older mice were injected with a standard 30 G needle. The total injection volume for each animal was 15 μL of either Al hydroxide in saline or saline alone.
2.4. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction
RNA extractions were carried out with the PureLink RNA Mini kit manual (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 100 mg of each brain tissue was ground thoroughly to powder in liquid nitrogen. 1.5 mL of lysis buffer prepared with 2-mercaptoethanol was added to the sample which was then homogenized for 45 s using a rotor-stator at maximum speed. The sample was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 2 min at room temperature and the supernatant transferred to a new ribonuclease-free tube. One volume of 70% ethanol was then added to the tissue homogenate which was mixed thoroughly and 700 μL of the sample transferred to a spin cartridge. The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 s at room temperature. 700 μL wash buffer I was then added to the spin cartridge and further centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 s at room temperature. 500 μL of wash buffer II with ethanol was added to the spin cartridge and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 s at room temperature. An additional centrifuge step at 12,000 × g for 1 min at room temperature was performed to dry the membrane with attached RNA. Finally, 50 μL of ribonuclease-free water was added to the center of the spin cartridge and the sample was incubated at room temperature for 1 min. To elutethe sample, a final centrifuge step was carried out, 2 min at ≥ 12,000 × g at room temperature.
2.5. Semi-quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
1 μg of total RNA was heated at 65 °C for 5 min and used as a template for the first strand cDNA synthesis. The reaction mixture contained 3 μg of random hexadeoxynucleotide primers (Invitrogen), 1 mM of deoxynucleotide (dNTP) mix (Invitrogen), 40 units of ribonuclease Inhibitor (Invitrogen), 1 × reverse transcriptionbuffer (Invitrogen) and 40 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV) reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 20 μL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 42 °C for 1 h, heated to 92 °C for 10 min. Non-reverse transcribed RNAs were included in each PCR reaction to exclude the contamination of genomic DNA. Housekeeping gene β-Actin was used as an input control. The gene-specific primers used for RT-PCR reactions were all located in the first exon of each gene producing around 200 bp PCR products. The sequences of the specific primers are listed in Table 2. PCR was performed using 2 μL of 5 × diluted first strand cDNA on a Perkin Elmer 9600 thermocycler in a total volume of 20 μL with 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), 0.2 mM of dNTP mix (Invitrogen), 1 × PCR buffer (Invitrogen) and 0.20 μM of each primer. The standard program comprised 30 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 55 °C and 30 s at 72 °C. PCR products were detected by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr) and visualized under ultraviolet light by video image system (Bio-Rad). The samples which were analyzed and compared to each other (control and Al treated tissues) were loaded on the same gel following the same settings of the image analyses. Densitometric analysis of EtBr-stained gel bands was performed using ImageJ software. t-tests were used to compare the means of two groups.
|Genes||Forward primers||Reverse primers|
2.6. Western blot analysis and antibodies
The brain tissue samples designated for Western blot analysis were placed in liquid nitrogen and snap-frozen. For a ~ 5 mg piece of tissue, ~ 300 μL lysis buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 1.0% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) was added rapidly and the tissue homogenized with an electric homogenizer and then maintained at constant agitation for 2 h at 4 °C. The sample was then centrifuged for 20 min at 12000 rpm at 4 °C. The supernatant was aspirated and the pellet discarded. 2х sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8 at 25 °C), 25% glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.01% bromophenol blue and 5% β-mercaptoethanol) was then added to the sample. The lysate was boiled at 100 °C for 5–10 min to denature the proteins in the sample. Protein for each sample was analyzed with 10% SDS-polyacrylamide resolving gels and 5% stacking gels using a Bio-Rad Gel electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad). The Bio-Rad Wet Transfer system (Bio-Rad) was then applied to transfer proteins from gels to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) by running at 100 V for 2 h in a cold room (4 °C). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk in Tris buffered saline tween 20 buffer (TBST) for 1 h and then probed with primary antibodies diluted in 3% bovine serum albumin/TBST at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies included: rabbit polyclonal actin, NF-κB p105/p50, phospho-NF-κB p65, phospho-IκKβ, phospho-IκKε antibodies (1:1000, Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal acetylcholinesterase (ACHE), nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-κB) inhibitors NFKBIB and NFKBIE antibodies (1:500; Santa Cruz), goat polyclonal C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFA) antibodies (1:500; Santa Cruz), goat polyclonal IFNG antibody (1:1000; Cell Signaling). The membrane was washed three times with TBST for 15 min and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000; Cell Signaling) and HRP-conjugated donkey anti-goat secondary antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was then washed three times for 15 min and results were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reaction assay (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Image J software was used to calculate and normalize the density of protein against the actin control.
3.1. Gene expression alterations in Al-injected female and male mice
In order to investigate the effect of early post-natal pediatric Al adjuvant exposure in a mouse model, we mimicked the U.S. vaccination schedules as closely as practically possible by subcutaneously administering Al to neonatal mice (Table 1). Following the completion of behavioral testing (results presented in a prior publication ), mice were euthanized, and the whole brain tissues were collected and applied to subsequent gene expression profiling. We sought to examine the effect of Al injection on the expression of specific immune markers in mice brains, in order to determine the potential causal link between Al exposure and ASD through hyperactivation of immune markers in the brain. Herbert et al.  reported 46 inflammatory genes that overlapped with ASD susceptibility genes that served our purpose, yet this was too broad of a range to be experimentally investigated. Given that Al carried by circulating macrophages is expected to mainly induce an innate immune response, we focused our efforts on innate immune system-related molecules associated with macrophagefunction. We thus cross-checked the 46 inflammatory genes identified by Herbert et al.  with the Innate Immune Database (http://www.innatedb.com/) to identify those with innate immune function and on the basis of this, 17 genes were selected (Table 3) for experimentally assessing gene expression variation in response to Al injection. We also selected for the purposes of our investigation the gene encoding ACHE, the enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of acetylcholine (ACh) and other choline esters that function as neurotransmitters, in addition to genes with specific function in the immunoinflammatory response. The gene product of ACHE is found predominantly at neuromuscular junctions and cholinergic synapses, where its activity serves to terminate synaptic transmission. The reason for this choice was two-fold: first, studies suggest that the activity of ACHE gene product (AChE) is altered in autism and that this alteration correlates with deficits in social functioning ; second, it is further known that many neurotransmitters play significant immunomodulatory roles and ACh in particular has been shown to dampen the immunoinflammatory response. Hence the inhibition of the degradatory activity of AChE in the CNS results in the suppression of the humoral immune response, while conversely, the inhibition of ACh synthesis causes the enhancement of the immune response [60,61].
|KLK1||Kallikrein 1||A subgroup of serine proteases implicated in carcinogenesis.|
|NFKBIB||Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, beta||The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the NF-kappa-B inhibitor family, which inhibits NF-kappa-B by complexing with, and trapping it in the cytoplasm.|
|NFKBIE||Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, epsilon||The protein encoded by this gene binds to components of NF-kappa-B, trapping the complex in the cytoplasm and preventing it from activating genes in the nucleus.|
|SFTPB||Surfactant protein B||This gene encodes the pulmonary-associated surfactant protein B (SPB), an amphipathic surfactant protein essential for lung function and homeostasis after birth.|
|ACHE||Acetylcholinesterase||Acetylcholinesterase hydrolyzes the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine at neuromuscular junctions and brain cholinergic synapses, and thus terminates signal transmission.|
|C2||Complement component 2||A serum glycoprotein that functions as part of the classical pathway of the complement system.|
|CCL2||Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2||Chemokines are a superfamily of secreted proteins involved in immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes.|
|CEBPB||Enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), beta||Activity of this protein is important in the regulation of genes involved in immune and inflammatory responses.|
|CRP||C-reactive protein||It is involved in several host defense related functions based on its ability to recognize foreign pathogens and damaged cells of the host and to initiate their elimination by interacting with humoral and cellular effector systems in the blood.|
|IFNG||Interferon gamma||The protein encoded is a soluble cytokine with antiviral, immunoregulatory and anti-tumor properties and is a potent activator of macrophages.|
|LTB||Lymphotoxin beta||An inducer of the inflammatory response system and involved in normal development of lymphoid tissue.|
|MMP9||Matrix metallopeptidase 9||Involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix in normal physiological processes, such as embryonic development, reproduction, and tissue remodeling.|
|PACRG||PARK2 co-regulated||The parkin co-regulated gene protein forms a large molecular complex with chaperones, including heat shock proteins 70 and 90, and chaperonin components.|
|SELE||Selectin E||Found in cytokine-stimulated endothelial cells and is thought to be responsible for the accumulation of blood leukocytes at sites of inflammation by mediating the adhesion of cells to the vascular lining.|
|SERPINE1||Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E||The principal inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase (uPA), and an inhibitor of fibrinolysis.|
|STAT4||Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4||In response to cytokines and growth factors, STAT family members are phosphorylated by the receptor associated kinases, and then form homo- or heterodimers that translocate to the cell nucleus where they act as transcription activators.|
|TNFA||Tumor necrosis factor alpha||This cytokine is mainly secreted by macrophages, involved in the regulation of a wide spectrum of biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, lipid metabolism, and coagulation.|
We first examined the gene and protein expression changes in whole brain samples. The semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses of the samples of Al-injected CD-1 male mice revealed 7 gene expression alterations in comparison to control male mice, including four genes which showed upregulation (CCL2, interferon gamma (IFNG), lymphotoxin beta (LTB), and TNFA) and three which were downregulated (ACHE, C-reactive protein(C2), and NFKBIB) (Fig. 1A, B). Five out of 7 gene expression alterations were verified at the protein level on Western blots (Fig. 1C, D), including IFNG and TNFA both of which are multifunctional proinflammatory cytokines and macrophage activators [62,63]that exhibited more than three-fold increase. Next in the sequence of significantly upregulated genes and its corresponding protein product was CCL2,a macrophage-secreted chemokine, also known as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) . In contrast, the expression levels of both ACHE and NFKBIB were significantly decreased in Al-injected male mice. We next examined the expression pattern of genes of interest in female mice. Two gene expression alterations, namely, upregulation of TNFA and downregulation of NFKBIE were identified in whole brain samples of Al-injected female mice compared to control female mice (Fig. 2A, B). Both of these gene expression alterations were confirmed at the protein level by the Western blot analysis (Fig. 2C, D). Taken together, a number of changes indicative of the activation of the immune-mediated NF-κB pathway were observed in both male and female mice brains as a result of Al-injection, although females seemed to be less susceptible than males as fewer genes were found altered in female brains.
3.2. Deactivation of NF-κB inhibitor in Al-injected male mice
Having established that the NF-κB inhibitors in both male and female were downregulated by Al exposure, we sought to determine whether NF-κB signaling activity was affected by Al injection. NF-κB is composed of two subunits: p65 (RelA) and p50 (NF-κB1). p50 is synthesized as longer precursor molecules of p105 which is further processed to smaller, transcriptionally active forms. p65 activity requires enhancement by phosphorylation [65,66]. NF-κB exists in the cytoplasm in an inactive form associated with inhibitory proteins termed IκB, of which the most important ones may be IκBβ encoded by NFKBIB gene, and IκBε encoded by NFKBIE gene. Upon exposure to activation signal such as TNF-α, the IκB is phosphorylated, degraded and released from the NF-κB heterodimer [65–68]. Thus, the activation of NF-κB depends on three elements: processing of p50 from its precursor p105, and phosphorylation of p65 and IκB. To determine if NF-κB was activated in the brains of Al-injected mice, we analyzed p50, p65 and IκB in detail by using phosphorylation-specific antibodies of p65, IκBβ and IκBε, and p105/p50 antibody which detects endogenous levels of the precursor protein p105 and its cleavage product p50. As shown by the Western blotting results (Fig. 3A), in both male and female mice exposed to Al, the phosphorylation level of p65 was comparable between Al-injection group and control group. Similarly, the p105/p50 ratio of Al-injection group was comparable to that of the control group in both males and females (Fig. 3B).
At this point, we focused our investigation on the phosphorylation level of IκBβ in male mice and IκBε female mice given that the transcription of NFKBIB declined in males and NFKBIE in females. The Western blotting results showed that the phosphorylation of IκBβ was activated in the brains of male Al-injected mice in contrast to control male mice (Fig. 3C), indicating the deactivation of NF-κB inhibitor β. However, IκBε in Al-injected females remained unphosphorylated, as in control females (Fig. 3C). Overall, these results show that Al injection activated the NF-κB by deactivating the NF-κB inhibitor in the male brain, while it appeared to have no such influence on the female brain. In addition, the decreased transcription of NFKBIB and disabled IκBβ protein seem to form a negative feedback loop, in which less protein is required, and thus less protein is produced.
3.3. Activation of NF-κB pathway in Al-injected male mice
After activation, NF-κB induces the transcription of proinflammatory mediators of the innate immune response, including the cytokines TNF-α, interleukins IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, chemokines IL-8, MCP-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), enzymes cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), phospholipase A2(PLA2), and adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. These molecules are important components of the innate immune response to invading substance and are required for the migration of inflammatory and phagocytic cells to tissues where NF-κB has been activated in response to infection or injury [65,69]. As cited above, TNF-α acts, as a signal to launch the NF-κB pathway and simultaneously serves an inflammatory effector transcriptionally activated by NF-κB [69,70]. As already noted, TNFA gene expression was significantly upregulated in both male and female Al-injected mice (Fig. 1A, D; Fig. 2A, D). In an attempt to explore whether NF-κB activation led to the upregulation of the downstream components of the NF-κB signaling pathway besides TNFA, we conducted semi-quantitative RT-PCRs to measure the expression levels of all these NF-κB-dependent proinflammatory mediators in the brain tissues of both male and female mice. As anticipated, besides TNFA, other chemokine and cytokines were identified with elevated expression levels in the brains of Al-injected male mice, including macrophage-inflammatory protein MIP-1A, interleukins IL-4, and IL-6 (Fig. 4A–D). However, no further upregulation was detected in the female mice brains apart from TNFA (data not shown). Together, these results strongly suggest that the NF-κB pathway was activated in the brains of Al-injected male mice, resulting in the expression of excessive levels of immune and proinflammatory factors.
3.4. Brain region-specific gene expression in Al-injected female and male mice
We used whole brain tissues to obtain the above results of expression alterations in male and female mice. As it was of interest to further uncover if the detected alterations were region-specific, frontal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and cerebellum, the areas reported to be most affected in autism [6–8,71,72] were dissected and utilized in subsequent Western blot assays. In Al-injected male mice, 4 out of 5 expression alterations were enriched in frontal cortex (Fig. 5A). Most notably, the upregulations of TNFA and IFNG which exhibited the highest fold change and showed multiple concentration areas, while alterations of ACHE, CCL2 and NFKBIB were accumulated in only one area (Fig. 5A). The Al-injected females predictably exhibited fewer changes, namely, the upregulation of TNFA and downregulation of NFKBIE in the cerebellum (Fig. 5B). In summary, gene expression alterations displayed a brain region-specific pattern in both male and female mice. Most of the expression alterations were concentrated in the frontal cortex of Al-injected male mice, while the cerebellum appeared to be the key structure showing expression alterations in Al-injected female mice.
4.1. Autism as a neuroimmune and neuroinflammatory disorder
Autism is widely recognized as a disease with an underlying immunoinflammatory component, although heretofore little has been known about the molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed immune abnormalities [4–15]. In our current mouse model, subcutaneous injection of the Al adjuvant induced the activation of several key players of the innate immune response driven by NF-κB activation in various brain regions, most prominently in the frontal cortex of males and in the cerebellum of females. Specifically the expression levels of CCL2, IFNG and TNFAwere significantly upregulated, while the NF-κB inhibitor NFKBIB was downregulated in the brains of Al-injected male mice (Fig. 1B). In addition, the decrease of the NF-κB inhibitor and the consequent increase in inflammatory signals led to the elevation of NF-κB – responsive genes including MIP-1A, IL-4 and IL-6. Female mice appeared to be less susceptible to Al′s neuroinflammatory effects as only the expression levels of NF-κB inhibitor and TNFA were altered in Al-injected females (Fig. 2B). Some of the observed alterations in gene expression were also confirmed at the protein level, such as the increase of CCL2, IFN-γ and TNF-α in male brains (Fig. 1D) and the corresponding increase in IFN-γ and TNF-α in female brains (Fig. 2D). We further detected elevated levels of phosphorylated IκBβ in the brains of Al-injected male mice (Fig. 3C), indicating the deactivation of the NF-κB inhibitor β. However, IκBε in Al-injected females remained unphosphorylated, as in control females (Fig. 3C). Overall, these results show that Al injection activated NF-κB by deactivating the NF-κB inhibitor in the male brain, while it appeared to have less influence on the female brain. Furthermore, Al downregulated the gene expression of ACHE, the enzyme that controls the degradation of the neurotransmitter ACh in male mouse brain. In summary, Al triggered the innate immune response in the brain and altered cholinergic activity in male mice. Altogether, our results indicate that the Al adjuvant may impair brain function by interacting with neural and immune system mediators and by promoting inflammation and that males are more susceptible to this type of Al toxicity.
The ability of Al to influence gene expression in the brain has been previously well established by Lukiw et al. , in particular, at nanomolar concentrations, Al can bind to DNA and inhibit transcription from selected AT-rich promoters of human neocortical genes . Al′s repressive action on gene transcription is linked to its ability to 1) decrease the access of transcriptional machinery to initiation sites on DNA template by enhancing chromatin condensation [73,74]; and/or 2) interfere with adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-hydrolysis-powered separation of DNA strands either indirectly (by binding to phosphonucleotides and increasing the stability and melting temperature of DNA) or directly (by inhibiting the ATPase-dependent action of RNA polymerase) [27,73–76]. These effects were experimentally demonstrated at physiologically-relevant Al concentrations (10–100 nm) [27,77] and at levels that have been reported in Alzheimer disease patients’ chromatin fractions . Moreover, in addition to its direct and repressive action on gene expression, Al can directly promote transcription while indirectly promoting lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. In this manner, Al can activate the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-sensitive transcription factors, hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and NF-κB and augment specific neuroinflammatory and pro-apoptotic signaling cascades by driving the expression from a subset of HIF-1 and NF-κB – inducible promoters [78,79]. Both HIF-1 and NF-κB are upregulated in Alzheimer’s disease where they fuel the proinflammatory cycle which leads to further exacerbation of oxidative stress and inflammation, culminating in neuronal death .
A prolonged inflammatory response and oxidative stress, as well as immune dysfunction, underlie behavioral impairments in autism [7,8,13,14,81–84]. Indeed, numerous studies showed elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels both in serum and brain specimens of autism patients [7,14,15,85] which were in some cases correlated with impaired behavioral outcomes . Of specific interest in context to the present study are neuropathological post-mortem examinations on autistic brains conducted by Vargas et al.  which showed evidence of an active neuroinflammatory process in the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum with extensive loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Vargas et al.  studied both male and female brain specimens and although their analysis did not separate between the sexes it should be noted that in our animal model, the frontal cortex was the most affected area in males and cerebellum in females (Fig. 5). The most prominent pathological findings by Vargas et al.  were marked reactivity of the Bergmann’s astroglia in areas of Purkinje cell loss within the Purkinje cell layer, as well as marked astroglial reactions in the granule cell layer and cerebellar white matter. It should be further noted that the ability of adjuvant Al to induce dramatic activation of glial cells has been repeatedly demonstrated [45,47]. Moreover, the cytokine profiling conducted by Vargas et al.  indicated that MCP–1 (also known as CCL2) and tumor growth factor (TGF)–β1, derived from neuroglia, were the most prevalent cytokines in autistic compared to control brain tissues. The cerebrospinal fluid derived from autistic patients also showed a unique proinflammatory profile of cytokines, including a marked increase in MCP-1 . Higher levels of IL-6 were also observed in the prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus of autism brain specimens compared to controls. Similarly, CCL2/MCP-1 and IL-6 were two of the key cytokines found elevated in male mice in our study (Fig. 1B, D; Fig. 4A, B), validating our animal model. Altogether these observations suggest that the autistic brain is a result of a disease process that arises from altered activity of immune-related pathways in the brain. Other evidence in support of this interpretation is the frequent finding of autoimmune manifestations, particularly those affecting the CNS, in autistic individuals who appear to have more widespread biochemical changes . Immune abnormalities in ASD are also present outside and beyond the nervous system. Indeed, a large body of data points to a role of systemic immune system dysregulation in the pathophysiology of ASD which is likely to precede the inflammatory and autoimmune manifestations in the brain [5,6,9,10,86,87].
4.2. Cytokine imbalances in autism
Abnormalities in the levels of cytokines and chemokines are as mentioned, an important pathological feature in the autistic brain and it is proposed that they may be the result of both genetic and environmental factors. Furthermore, the cytokine aberrations may directly contribute to autistic neurological dysfunctions [7,8,14,15,88,89]. The immune system and the nervous system are in constant communication and this communication is mainly mediated by immune cytokines. Thus, cytokines are known to influence both the development and the function of the nervous system. They influence cell differentiation and migration, establishment of synaptic connections, the release and biosynthesis of neurotransmitters, and are involved in diverse processes including cognition and memory, regulation of circadian rhythms, thermoregulation, endocrine and autonomic functions [4,15,90–92]. It is therefore not surprising to find aberrations in cytokine and chemokine levels in both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease states [93–96]. In autism, cytokine imbalances are thought to impair the proper structural development of the brain and consequently impact behavior [4,7,8,14,15,85,88,97]. Among the most notable cytokines and chemokines found to be deregulated in autism are IL-1β, IL-6, IL-4, MCP-1/CCL2, IFN-γ, TGF-β and TNF-α, all of which, with the exception of IL-1β and TGF- β were found to be upregulated in our Al-injected mice. Notably, elevated levels of these cytokines and chemokines are likewise seen in autistic patients, while TGF- β is decreased in autism [7,8,14,15,88,89].
4.3. Aberrant activation of the NF-κB pathway in autism
The inducible transcription factor NF-κB is a central regulator of the immune response. The activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway induces the expression of numerous inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and leads to the innate immune response in mammals. NF-κB is present in almost all cell types where it mediates cellular responses to a variety of stress stimuli (such as oxidative stress and antigen exposure) and mediates the expression of a wide array of immunoregulatory genes [65,68,98–101]. Under normal conditions, NF-κB is present in the cytoplasm as an inactive heterotrimer, with its two subunits p65 and p50 associated with the inhibitory protein IκB. Stimulation with a proinflammatory cytokine such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, activates the IκB kinase complex, triggering the degradation of IκB and allowing free NF-kB heterodimer to translocate into the nucleus and activate the expression of immune and inflammatory-related genes [65–68]. Since NF-κB is itself activated by the same inflammatory cytokines and chemokines which it induces , NF-κB is thus regulated via a positive feedback mechanism which becomes aberrantly active, resulting in a chronic inflammatory response . Indeed, while NF-κB activity is essential for proper function of the immune system, its constitutive activation has been associated with numerous disease states such as aging-related diseases, malignancies and various inflammatory diseases [68,102,103], including those of the nervous system such as Alzheimer’s disease [104,105], Parkinson’s disease , multiple sclerosis  and also autism [5,6].
Although female mice appeared to be less susceptible to Al exposure than male mice, it is notable that markers of activation of the NF-κB pathway were observed in both sexes, Namely, Al reduced the expression levels of the of NF-κB inhibitor proteins IκBβ and IκBε (encoded by the NFKBIB and NFKBIE genes respectively) and increased the level of TNF-α both at the gene and protein level in males (Fig. 1B, D) and females (Fig. 2B, D). In addition, in the male brains Al increased the expression at the gene and protein level of chemokines CCL2/MCP-1 and IFN-γ (Fig. 1B, D), both of which are NF-κB targets [108,109]. Al also activated the phosphorylation of the IκB inhibitor in the brains of male mice, indicating that Al exposure activated the NF-κB pathway by deactivating the NF-κB inhibitor (Fig. 3C). Consequently, the expression levels of other NF-κB downstream target genes were also elevated in the male brains, including MIP-1A, and the interleukins IL-4, and IL-6 (Fig. 4A-D). Altogether, the current results demonstrate that Al exposure activated the NF-κB pathway in the brains of male mice, resulting in excessive levels of immune and inflammatory factors.
The aberrant activation of the NF-κB pathway has been demonstrated in two studies of autistic children. In particular, Naik et al.  showed a significant increase in NF-κB DNA binding activity in peripheral blood samples of children with autism (n = 67) compared to healthy controls (n = 29). Further commenting on their findings, Naik et al.  have concluded that children with autism could be in a “hyper arousal” state of NF-kB due to the constant effect of environmental stressors. The adjuvant form of injected Al is engulfed by macrophages that can traverse the blood-brain-barrier, invade and accumulate in the CNS [38,41,42], thus Al could act as a constant stimulator of the immunoinflammatory and oxidative stress pathways via its activation of HIF-1 and NF-κB responsive genes [78,79]. Indeed, as Naik et al.  note, one of the key ways in which the NF-κB pathway is activated is through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) . Moreover, ROS generation is related to stress which could be due to multiple environmental and behavioral factors. Although evidence of increased oxidative stress appears to be absent in mice exposed to Al, our analysis was limited to only three oxidative stress markers, COX-2, iNOS and PLA2. Subsequent work should include a more elaborate investigation including markers of lipid peroxidation which are shown to be increased in autism [81,82], especially given the fact that Al is a known inducer of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. Indeed, as noted above, it is in this way that Al activates the ROS-sensitive transcription factors, HIF-1 as well as NF-κB and augments specific neuroinflammatory and pro-apoptotic signaling cascades [78,79].
Other relevant findings regarding the aberrant activation of NF-κB in autism were supplied by Young et al.  who showed elevated expression of NF-κB in post-mortem brain samples of autistic patients compared to control samples. In particular, excessive NF-κB subunit p65 expression has been observed predominantly in the nuclear compartments of the orbitofrontal cortex. The immunofluorescence analysis further showed that these relative increases in expression localized to neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, but were particularly pronounced in highly activated microglia. The elevated levels of NF-κB in the nuclear fraction clearly suggest the activation of the molecule . Previously, as mentioned above, Vargas et al. [7,8] showed extensive neuroglial and innate neuroimmune system activation in brain tissues of patients with autism, particularly in the cortical region. In our study, the frontal cortex was similarly the most affected area by the proinflammatory signaling in the male brain (Fig. 5A). Our work together with the report by Young et al.  indicates that excessive activation of the NF-κB pathway appears to be responsible for the observed immunoinflammatory response in the cortex of autistic patients, the brain regions involved in emotional and cognitive processing, learning, and social behavior, all of which are impaired in individuals with autism [110,111]. Moreover, current research supports the hypothesis that autism results from altered connections within or between regions of the cortex . Indeed, abnormal neural connectivity is one of the key pathological features of the autistic brain. The term connectivity encompasses local connectivity within neural assemblies and long-range connectivity between brain regions. Similarly, there is also physical connectivity (“hard-wiring”), associated with synapses, tracts and functional connectivity (“soft-wiring”), associated with neurotransmission . High local connectivity may develop in tandem with low long-range connectivity in the autistic brain . In summary, abundant evidence supports our findings that abnormal activity of immune signaling in the brain interferes with the establishment of appropriate neuronal circuitry during development, thus contributing to the emergence of autistic phenotypes [4,56,97].
4.4. AChE dysregulation in autism and the role of AChE in immunomodulation
Apart from the activation of immune and inflammatory markers in the brain, we observed a decreased expression of ACHE as well as its protein product (AChE) in Al-injected male mice (Fig. 1B, D). Cholinergic activity is involved in numerous neurological functions relevant to autistic pathology including attention, social interactions, emotional responses, stereotypical behaviors, cognition, and memory [59,114,115]. Not surprisingly, deficits in cholinergic activity have been detected in autism, in particular, post-mortem observations showed altered expression of nicotinic ACh receptors and others [114,116]. Thus pharmacological enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission (and that includes the inhibition of the degradatory activity of AChE) appears to be beneficial in some autistic patients, resulting in improvement in cognitive abilities, attention and memory . Consistent with this, AChE inhibition and the resultant ACh elevation appears to decrease cognitive rigidity, improve social preference and enhance social interaction in a mouse model of autism . On the other hand, decreased activity of AChE in the hippocampus was also reported to be associated with increased anxiety, depression-like behaviors and decreased resilience to repeated stress in another rodent model . Adults with autism exhibited reduced AChE activity in the fusiform gyrus but not in other cortical areas, presenting further evidence that this type of abnormality may be associated with social dysfunction . It is well established that the region of the fusiform gyrus called the fusiform face area is consistently active during face viewing in normally developing individuals . In contrast, autistic individuals lack fusiform face area activation in response to strangers’ faces . Fusiform gyrus activity including face recognition tasks are processes which critically depends on cholinergic signaling [121,122]. It is further thought that the hypofunction of the fusiform face area in autism may be due to neuropathological abnormalities in the fusiform gyrus and abnormal functional connectivity between the right fusiform gyrus and the left amygdala [59,123]. Because ACh is significantly involved in the regulation of both structural and functional maturation of cortical circuits and because the modulatory effect of ACh in turn depends on AChE activity, it is thought that reduced AChE activity in the fusiform gyrus may in part contribute to the reduction in the number of cholinoceptive neurons observed post-mortem in the fusiform gyrus of autistic patients [59,124].
Although the fusiform gyrus is not present in rodents, there is another explanation for the resultant pattern of AChE expression in our study; namely, the well-known immunoregulatory role of neurotransmitters [60,61]. ACh is the primary parasympathetic neurotransmitter and the receptors to which it binds (nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors) are found on numerous types of immune cells. Nicotinic receptors, in particular, are known to mediate cholinergic anti-inflammatory effects in macrophages. Notably, activation of the nicotinic ACh receptor on macrophages inhibits NF-κB signaling, thereby dampening the immunoinflammatory response [125,126]. The immunoregulatory cholinergic pathway also prevents excessive elevations of serum levels of TNF-α during toxic shock, through the release of ACh from the vagus nerve (and is consequently abolished by vagotomy), hence preventing excessive inflammatory responses [127,128]. Consistent with the attenuating effect of ACh on immunoinflammatory effects, the inhibition of ACh synthesis causes the enhancement of immune response [60,61]. Similarly, AChE potentially negates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory effects via its hydrolysis of ACh, not surprisingly, elevated expression of AChE is found in many inflammatory conditions. Conversely, inhibition of the degradatory activity of AChE via AChE inhibitors results in the suppression of the humoral immune response and the amelioration of inflammation not only in the periphery but also in the CNS [60,129,130]. As an example of the latter, in the brain AChE upregulation is associated with an enhanced immune response that facilitates the epileptogenic process in status epilepticus while ACh has the opposite effect . It is notable in this respect that an estimated 5–40% of children with autism suffer from seizures and this association tends to be stronger in more severely affected patients .
In summary, the parasympathetic nervous system is activated by inflammatory cytokines and via cholinergic activity while providing a negative-feedback control of innate immune responses to restore homeostasis. Therefore it seems plausible that the degradatory activity of AChE was downregulated in Al-injected male mice in order to activate the ACh-mediated immunosuppressive mechanism that restores homeostasis.
4.5. The mechanistic link between immune stimuli and adverse neurological outcomes: How vaccine adjuvants may contribute to autism
Extensive research has underscored the tight connection between development of the immune system and that of the CNS, thus substantiating the view that disruption of critical events in immune development may play a role in neurobehavioral disorders including those of the autism spectrum [4,9,15,86,90,91]. Thus, it has been proposed that the widespread manifestations of immune abnormalities in ASD may stem from deleterious effects of immune insults that occur during a narrow window of postnatal development which is characterized by extensive shaping of both the CNS and the immune system [9,56,86]. Indeed, early-life immune insults (both peri- and post-natal) have been shown to produce long-lasting, highly abnormal cognitive and behavioral responses, including increased fear and anxiety, impaired social interactions, deficits in object recognition memory and sensorimotor gating deficits [51,53–56,132–134]. These symptoms are typical of ASD and result from the heightened vulnerability of the developing immune system to disruption by immunomodulating environmental pollutants such as bisphenol A, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and Al [9,56,86,133,135]. Of the later, although Hg and Al in particular can come from various sources, the one common source to which infants and pregnant women are universally exposed is through vaccinations. With respect to Al in the vaccine adjuvant form, over the last decade, studies on animal models and humans have indicated that Al adjuvants have an intrinsic ability to inflict adverse neurological and immunoinflammatory manifestations [45,47,136,137]. This research culminated in delineation of ASIA-“autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants”, which encompasses the wide spectrum of adjuvant-triggered medical conditions characterized by a misregulated immune response [138,139]. Notably, a large portion of adverse manifestations experimentally triggered by Al in animal models [45,140], and those associated with administration of adjuvanted vaccines in humans are neurological and neuropsychiatric [46,141]. The ability of Al adjuvants to cross the blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier [41–43,45,46] may in part explain the reason the adverse manifestations following vaccinations tend to be neurological with an underlying immunoinflammatory component [141–143]. Thus Al impacts on the CNS and immune system are reciprocally linked and not disparate actions [33,56,144,145].
It is important to note that Al or other agents with immunostimulating properties do not necessarily need to breach the blood-brain barrier in order to induce a neuroinflammatory response. Indeed, the principal mechanism by which peripheral (systemic) immune stimulation affects responses in the brain is critical to understanding the potential role of Al adjuvants in neurodevelopmental disorders of the autism spectrum. As noted above, an important advance in understanding the functions of the normal and diseased brains was the recognition that there is an extensive communication between the immune system and cells in the CNS [90,91]. As a result of this neuro-immune cross-talk, neural activity can be dramatically altered in response to a variety of immune stimuli [146–148]. Such peripheral immune stimuli lead to de novo production of proinflammatory cytokines within the brain by activated microglia, the brain’s resident immune cells [147,149]. Importantly, this immunoinflammatory response in the brain occurs even when the offending agent does not cross the blood-brain barrier [90,150].
Numerous studies show that proinflammatory responses arising from a single peripheral immune stimulus early in the postnatal period are sufficient to disrupt normal neural development [53,151]. Moreover, such immune stimuli can increase CNS vulnerability to subsequent immune insults that can permanently impair CNS function [152–155]. For example, new born rodents exposed to peripheral immune stimuli with either bacterial s or viral antigen mimetics within the first two postnatal weeks, develop deficits in social interactions, altered responses to novel situations, anxiety-like behaviors, impairments in memory, long-lasting increase in seizure susceptibility, abnormal immune cytokine profiles and increased extracellular glutamate in the hippocampus [53–55,155,156]. All of these abnormalities are observed in autistic children in various degrees [2,7,157,158].
Repeated exposure to bacterial and viral antigens (most of which are adsorbed to Al adjuvants) through current vaccination schedules is clearly analogous both in nature and timing to peripheral immune stimulation with microbial mimetics in experimental animals during early periods of developmental vulnerability of the CNS. In view of these clear analogies, pediatric vaccinations can no longer be dismissed as a plausible cause for the growing burden of neurodevelopmental and immune abnormalities in children .
Research data further show that many cytokines induced by an immune response (including adjuvant-mediated) can act as “endogenous pyrogens”. That is, cytokines can induce a rapid-onset fever by acting directly on the hypothalamus without requiring the formation of other cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α [90,160–162]). While transient fever is an essential component of the early immune response to infection, the prolonged febrile response is a hallmark of many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases . Moreover, fever-promoting cytokines produced in peripheral tissues upon immune stimulation can enter the brain via the circumventricular organs , which are among the few sites in the brain devoid of a blood-brain barrier, and can thus promote brain inflammation. That persistent hyperinflammation of the CNS plays a prominent role in the development of autism is solidly established by the existing data [6–8]. At least 13 cytokines and chemokines are produced within 4 h of Al adjuvant injection, including pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-6 . Since the very nature of peripheral immune stimulation can influence brain function, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of vaccines and vaccine adjuvants deserves consideration. In this context, research shows that Al adjuvants activate 312 genes, 168 of which play a role in immune activation and inflammation .
In humans, the best studied condition linked to adjuvant Al is the neuromuscular disorder macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF), a condition characterized by highly specific myopathological alterations in deltoid muscle biopsies due to long-term persistence of vaccine-derived Al hydroxide nanoparticles within macrophages at the site of previous vaccine injections [136,137,165]. Patients diagnosed with MMF tend to be female (70%) and middle-aged at time of biopsy (median age 45 years), having received 1 to 17 intramuscular Al-containing vaccines (mean 5.3) in the 10 years before MMF detection . Clinical manifestations in MMF patients include diffuse myalgia, arthralgia, chronic fatigue, muscle weakness and cognitive dysfunction. Overt cognitive alterations affecting memory and attention are manifested in 51% of cases. In addition to chronic fatigue syndrome, 15–20% of patients with MMF concurrently develop an autoimmune disease .
The pathological significance of the MMF lesion has long been poorly understood because of the lack of an obvious link between persistence of Al agglomerates in macrophages at sites of previous vaccination and delayed onset of systemic and neurological manifestations. However, recent experiments in animal models have revealed that injected nano-Al adjuvant particles have a unique capacity to travel to distant organs including the spleen and the brain where they are detected up to one year following injection [41,42]. Moreover, the Trojan horse-like mechanism by which Al enters the brain, results in its slow accumulation and is likely responsible for cognitive impairments associated with administration of Al-containing vaccines [136,137]. The bioaccumulation of Al in the brain appears to occur at a very low rate in normal conditions, thus potentially explaining the presumably good overall tolerance of this adjuvant despite its strong neurotoxic potential. Nonetheless, according to Khan et al. , continuously increasing doses of the poorly biodegradable Al adjuvant may become insidiously unsafe, especially in cases of repetitive closely-spaced vaccinations and altered blood-brain barrier.
Yet, while an adult MMF patient may have received up to 17 vaccines in 10 years prior to diagnosis , an average child in the U.S. would have received about the same number of Al-adjuvanted vaccines in their first 18 months of life according to the current U.S. CDC vaccination schedule . In humans, important aspects of brain development (i.e., synaptogenesis) occur during the first 2 years after birth [167,168], a period in which the immature brain is extremely vulnerable to neurotoxic and immunotoxic insults [9,86,167]. This is the time when children receive the majority of their pediatric vaccinations. In view of these observations, there should be concern about the potential risks of injected vaccine-derived Al for which total clearance from the CNS may be virtually impossible due binding with neural proteins, DNA and hence, its progressive accumulation .
Several recent studies support the possibility that Al may participate in the growing burden of ASD. For example, Melendez et al.  have recently shown an elevation of several metals including chromium, arsenic and particularly Al in the blood of autistic children in comparison to the reference values for normal children. These authors identified two important items of data regarding exposure to toxic metals. First, in 80% of cases the autistic children have used controlled drugs and 90% of them have received all of their vaccines. In addition, 70% of mothers had received vaccines. Hence, the results by Melendez et al.  suggest that cumulative exposure to Al from pharmaceutical sources (i.e., Al-containing drugs and vaccines) in early periods of developmental vulnerability (both pre- and postnatal) may contribute to the development of ASD. These findings indicate that Al is another environmental agent that can now be added to the list of xenobiotics associated with developmental immunotoxicity (as defined by Dietert and Dietert ) and thus an important, yet underappreciated, risk factor in disorders of the autism spectrum. A study by Yasuda and Tsutsui  likewise supports this conclusion. These authors examined hair concentrations of 26 trace elements in 1967 children with autistic disorders aged 0–15 years, and demonstrated that many of the patients, especially the infants aged 0–3 years-old, were suffering from marginal to severe zinc (Zn) and magnesium (Mg) deficiency and/or high burdens of several toxic metals. Moreover, the highest proportion of infants had Al-overload, followed by cadmium (Cd) and Pb, in this critical period of early neurodevelopmental vulnerability.
4.6. Gender difference and female protective effect in ASD
Most neuropsychiatric diseases have a sex bias in their presentation. ASD affects males 4 times more than females . Conversely, the frequency of depressive disorder and anxiety disorder are greater in females. The cause for these differences is not well understood. An important distinction between these two cohorts of disorders is that those which are male biased tend to occur early in development, whereas those that are more prevalent in females generally do not occur until after puberty. Sex differentiation in neuropsychiatric diseases was originally attributed to increased level of amino acid neurotransmitters, such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutamate in the male brain . However, multiple attempts to identify a neurotransmitter system subject to hormonal regulation and serving as the final common denominator of steroid-hormone induced masculinization of the brain have largely failed. Newer research has demonstrated that the origins of many sex differences in the brain are outside the realm of neurotransmission but instead involving inflammatory and immune mediators such as microglia and mast cells, all of which are higher in males . In our current study, we present evidence that the deleterious consequences of early post-natal Al exposure that seem to stem from over-activation of the innate immune system in brain, display sex differences. Male brains were more affected as more immune factors were activated in male mice in response to Al exposure. From this outcome it follows that the female nervous system is possibly more resistant to early stage Al toxicity. In this instance, TNFA decreased in the thalamus perhaps to offset the TNFA upregulation in the frontal cortex of Al-injected females (Fig. 5B).
ASD is a disorder that mainly manifests in early childhood. Sex-specific states may present as a window of vulnerability, where the normal developmental trajectory becomes most susceptible to reprogramming. The potential for early developmental insults, such as Al intake through neonatal vaccination, to alter this trajectory underlines the putative etiological role of Al in ASD. Based on the critical role for neuroimmune signaling in programming of the sexually dimorphic brain and neural toxicity of Al, it is possible that Al mediates the brain’s inflammatory response and contributes to the disruption of “normal” sex differences related to neurodevelopmental disease susceptibility. Obviously, more detailed studies are required to test these ideas.
Immune activation is a prominent feature of ASD in autopsy material. Numerous immune system abnormalities have been described in individuals with autism. Chief among these is the increased activation of the innate immune response in autistic brain specimens [6–8]. However, the mechanism by which the innate immune system is activated remains far from clear. Although our Al-based model of ASD is still being developed and remains preliminary, the present study has shown extensive upregulation of innate immune activators and downregulation of innate immune inhibitors via the NF- κB pathway stimulation in the CNS of Al-treated mice. In addition, the degradatory activity of AChE was downregulated in Al-injected make mice, possibly to activate the ACh-mediated immunosuppressive mechanism and restore homeostasis.
Based on the data we have obtained to date, we propose a tentative working hypothesis of a molecular cascade that may serve to explain a causal link between Al and the innate immune response in the brain (Fig. 6). In this proposed scheme, Al may be carried by the macrophages via a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that described for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C viruses [173,174], travelling across the blood-brain-barrier to invade the CNS. Once inside the CNS, Al activates various proinflammatory factors and inhibits NF-κB inhibitors, the latter leading to activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and the release of additional immune factors. Alternatively, the activation of the brain’s immune system by Al may also occur without Al traversing the blood-brain barrier, via neuroimmuno-endocrine signaling. Either way, it appears evident that the innate immune response in the brain can be activated as a result of peripheral immune stimuli. The ultimate consequence of innate immune over-stimulation in the CNS is the disruption of normal neurodevelopmental pathways resulting in autistic behavior.
It may be argued that if the aim of the present study was to investigate an ASD risk factor, and ASD is a childhood disorder, why then were mice sacrificed at 16 weeks of age (adult age, given that female mice become sexually mature at 6 weeks after birth and males at 8 weeks) and not at earlier time-points? The answer to this is that our initial aim was to investigate whether Al had long-term consequences on neurodevelopment that would persist into adulthood since autistic symptoms obviously do not disappear in adult ages. Our following study aims to investigate an earlier time point, namely 22 days postnatal.
In conclusion, our data support a gene-environmental factor interaction model, which posits that complex diseases, such as ASD, are etiologically and biologically heterogeneous. The effect of the genes is conditional on the environment and a particular genotype may uniquely sensitize particular individuals to certain toxic environmental factors such as Al. It is plausible to further hypothesize that individuals already affected by ASD may react differently to the same environmental stimuli and may have less tolerance to the prenatal or postnatal immunotoxic exposures due to genetic predispositions. Our study highlights the additive contributions of immune genes and environmental toxins in a mouse model of early post-natal exposure.
The observed array of gene and protein expression changes in Al-injected mice suggests that the impact of Al may be broad and profound in the CNS, however, the toxicity may ultimately converge on highly specified biological pathways during brain development instead of being randomly distributed. One of the candidate biological pathways discovered in the present study is the NF-κB pathway. The toxicity of Al may thus lie in altering the signal flow through the NF-κB pathway. Upon the activation of the NF-κB heterodimer by Al, the gate of NF-κB signaling is open and excessive proinflammatory factors are released to mediate an aberrant immune response especially in the brains of male mice. The upregulated NF-κB-dependent immune factors could amplify the signal output by inducing NF-κB activation in return. Hence, the small input made by Al injection gives rise to a large magnitude of perturbation on the innate immune system in the brain through this positive feedback loop.
Finally, two limitations need to be noted with regard to the study methods. First, it should be noted that in this study we did not make separate controls for dietary Al ingestion. Although as noted above, only a small proportion of Al derived from dietary sources (food and water) is absorbed into the systemic circulation (~ 0.25%) as opposed to injected Al (which is absorbed at over 50% efficiency in the short term and at nearly 100% efficiency long-term ), even dietary Al has been shown to accumulate in CNS over time, resulting in Alzheimer’s disease type outcomes. This particular neurotoxic effect of Al has been observed in experimental animals fed equivalent amounts of Al to what humans consume through a typical Western diet [26,37]. The amount of Al in Purina chow brands can vary and may well have significant effects in the long term. Nonetheless, all our animals, Al-injected and non-injected, received the same chow and the same water, yet there were significant differences in inflammatory gene and protein expression in the brain between the Al-exposed and control groups. Hence, these differences could not have been due to the dietary Al which was the same across all groups. Additionally, the Al-injected females were less affected by these inflammatory changes than Al-injected males, which further agree with the observation that females are less susceptible than males to a range of neurotoxicant and neural-injury effects due to the protective effects of estrogen [175–178]. In an ideal situation, two additional groups of animals would have been included in order to control for the effect of dietary Al: 1) mice fed with Al-free Purina chow and Al-free high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-treated water, and, 2) mice injected with Al and fed with Al-free Purina chow and Al-free HPLC-treated water. However the addition of such controls was beyond the scope of the current preliminary study.
The second limitation is that no controls were included to ascertain that Al, if perhaps present after RNA extraction from Al-treated mice, did not influence reverse transcriptase enzyme activity hence yielding a spurious result. Nonetheless, the fact that the majority of gene expression changes were confirmed at the protein level via Western blotting, makes this interpretation improbable. Moreover, there is no evidence that Al inhibits reverse transcriptase but rather the transcriptional machinery involving DNA polymerase, as cited above [27,73–76]. Indeed, Sabbioni et al.  tested 44 different metal ions for their ability to inhibit HIV reverse transcriptase, Al included. Al showed no activity against reverse transcriptase, but only platinum (Pt4 +), silver (Ag+), rhodium (Rh3 +), Zn2 + and Hg 2 + decreased the reverse transcriptase activity in a dose-response manner.
The authors thank the Dwoskin Family Foundation (grant # 20R73006), the Katlyn Fox Foundation (grant # 20R47306) and the Luther Allyn Shourds Dean estate (grant # 20R17162) for financial support. We are also grateful to Agripina Suarez and other laboratory members for their assistance.
G. Vannucchi, G. Masi, C. Toni, L. Dell’Osso, D. Marazziti, G. PerugiCNS Spectr., 19 (2014), pp. 157-164
C.J. Newschaffer, L.A. Croen, J. Daniels, E. Giarelli, J.K. Grether, S.E. Levy, D.S. Mandell, L.A.Miller, J. Pinto-Martin, J. Reaven, A.M. Reynolds, C.E. Rice, D. Schendel, G.C. WindhamAnnu. Rev. Public Health, 28 (2007), pp. 235-258
A. Vojdani, A.W. Campbell, E. Anyanwu, A. Kashanian, K. Bock, E. VojdaniJ. Neuroimmunol., 129 (2002), pp. 168-177
P.A. Garay, A.K. McAllisterFront Synaptic Neurosci, 2 (2010), p. 136
U.S. Naik, C. Gangadharan, K. Abbagani, B. Nagalla, N. Dasari, S.K. MannaPLoS One, 6 (2011), Article e19488
A.M. Young, E. Campbell, S. Lynch, J. Suckling, S.J. PowisFront. Psychol., 2 (27) (2011)
D.L. Vargas, C. Nascimbene, C. Krishnan, A.W. Zimmerman, C.A. PardoAnn. Neurol., 57 (2005), pp. 67-81
C.A. Pardo, D.L. Vargas, A.W. ZimmermanInt. Rev. Psychiatry, 17 (2005), pp. 485-495
R.R. Dietert, J.M. DietertJ. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev., 11 (2008), pp. 660-680
T.C. Theoharides, D. Kempuraj, L. RedwoodExpert. Opin. Pharmacother., 10 (2009), pp. 2127-2143
M.L. Castellani, C.M. Conti, D.J. Kempuraj, V. Salini, J. Vecchiet, S. Tete, C. Ciampoli, F. Conti, G.Cerulli, A. Caraffa, P. Antinolfi, R. Galzio, Y. Shaik, T.C. Theoharides, D. De Amicis, A. Perrella, C.Cuccurullo, P. Boscolo, M. Felaco, R. Doyle, C. Verrocchio, M. FulcheriInt. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol., 22 (2009), pp. 15-19
T.C. Theoharides, B. ZhangJ. Neuroinflammation, 8 (2011), p. 168
P. Ashwood, S. Wills, J. Van de WaterJ. Leukoc. Biol., 80 (2006), pp. 1-15
P. Ashwood, P. Krakowiak, I. Hertz-Picciotto, R. Hansen, I. Pessah, J. Van de WaterBrain Behav. Immun., 25 (2011), pp. 40-45
P.E. Goines, P. AshwoodNeurotoxicol. Teratol., 36 (2013), pp. 67-81
S.C. Deoni, J.R. Zinkstok, E. Daly, C. Ecker, M.A. Consortium, S.C. Williams, D.G. MurphyPsychol. Med., 45 (2015), pp. 795-805
S.H. Ameis, M. CataniCortex, 62 (2015), pp. 158-181
R.K. Kana, L.E. Libero, M.S. MoorePhys Life Rev, 8 (2011), pp. 410-437
Y.S. Chang, J.P. Owen, S.S. Desai, S.S. Hill, A.B. Arnett, J. Harris, E.J. Marco, P. MukherjeePLoS One, 9 (2014), Article e103038
M.L. Bauman, T.L. KemperInt. J. Dev. Neurosci., 23 (2005), pp. 183-187
E.R. Whitney, T.L. Kemper, D.L. Rosene, M.L. Bauman, G.J. BlattJ. Neurosci. Res., 87 (2009), pp. 2245-2254
A. Bailey, P. Luthert, A. Dean, B. Harding, I. Janota, M. Montgomery, M. Rutter, P. LantosBrain, 121 (Pt 5) (1998), pp. 889-905
P. Chaste, M. LeboyerDialogues Clin. Neurosci., 14 (2012), pp. 281-292
L. TomljenovicJ. Alzheimers Dis., 23 (2011), pp. 567-598
J.R. WaltonCurr. Inorg. Chem., 2 (2012), pp. 19-39
J.R. Walton, M.X. WangJ. Inorg. Biochem., 103 (2009), pp. 1548-1554
W.J. LukiwAluminum and gene transcription in the mammalian central nervous system-implications for Alzheimer’s diseaseC. Exley (Ed.), Aluminium and Alzheimer’s Disease: the Science that Describes the Link, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2001), pp. 147-169
A. Becaria, D.K. Lahiri, S.C. Bondy, D. Chen, A. Hamadeh, H. Li, R. Taylor, A. CampbellJ. Neuroimmunol., 176 (2006), pp. 16-23
C. Exley, E. HouseMonatsh. Chem., 142 (2011), pp. 357-363
H. Sinczuk-Walczak, M. Szymczak, G. Razniewska, W. Matczak, W. SzymczakInt. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health, 16 (2003), pp. 301-310
J. Savory, M.M. Herman, O. GhribiJ. Alzheimers Dis., 10 (2006), pp. 135-144
C. Exley, M.M. EsiriJ. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 77 (2006), pp. 877-879
C.A. Shaw, L. TomljenovicImmunol. Res., 56 (2013), pp. 304-316
S.A. Burrell, C. ExleyBMC Pediatr., 10 (2010), p. 63
R.E. Flarend, S.L. Hem, J.L. White, D. Elmore, M.A. Suckow, A.C. Rudy, E.A. DandashliVaccine, 15 (1997), pp. 1314-1318
R.A. Yokel, P.J. McNamaraPharmacol. Toxicol., 88 (2001), pp. 159-167
J.R. WaltonNeurosci. Lett., 412 (2007), pp. 29-33
R.K. Gherardi, H. Eidi, G. Crepeaux, F.J. Authier, J. CadusseauFront. Neurol., 6 (2015), p. 4
R. Gherardi, F. AuthierLupus, 21 (2012), pp. 184-189
S.H. LeeAdvances Biol Chem, 3 (2013), pp. 76-85
Z. Khan, C. Combadiere, F.J. Authier, V. Itier, F. Lux, C. Exley, M. Mahrouf-Yorgov, X. Decrouy, P.Moretto, O. Tillement, R.K. Gherardi, J. CadusseauBMC Med., 11 (2013), p. 99
G. Crepeaux, H. Eidi, M.O. David, E. Tzavara, B. Giros, C. Exley, P.A. Curmi, C.A. Shaw, R.K.Gherardi, J. CadusseauJ. Inorg. Biochem., 152 (2015), pp. 199-205
K. Redhead, G.J. Quinlan, R.G. Das, J.M. GutteridgePharmacol. Toxicol., 70 (1992), pp. 278-280
M.S. Petrik, M.C. Wong, R.C. Tabata, R.F. Garry, C.A. ShawNeuroMolecular Med., 9 (2007), pp. 83-100
C.A. Shaw, M.S. PetrikJ. Inorg. Biochem., 103 (2009), pp. 1555-1562
L. Lujan, M. Perez, E. Salazar, N. Alvarez, M. Gimeno, P. Pinczowski, S. Irusta, J. Santamaria, N.Insausti, Y. Cortes, L. Figueras, I. Cuartielles, M. Vila, E. Fantova, J.L. ChapulleImmunol. Res., 56 (2013), pp. 317-324
X. Li, H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Huang, H.J. Schluesener, Y. Li, S. XuNanomedicine, 5 (2009), pp. 473-479
C. ExleyFree Radic. Biol. Med., 36 (2004), pp. 380-387
A. Seubert, E. Monaci, M. Pizza, D.T. O’Hagan, A. WackJ. Immunol., 180 (2008), pp. 5402-5412
M. Ulanova, A. Tarkowski, M. Hahn-Zoric, L.A. HansonInfect. Immun., 69 (2001), pp. 1151-1159
C.A. Shaw, Y. Li, L. TomljenovicJ. Inorg. Biochem., 128 (2013), pp. 237-244
D.M. Werling, D.H. GeschwindCurr. Opin. Neurol., 26 (2013), pp. 146-153
D. Ibi, T. Nagai, Y. Kitahara, H. Mizoguchi, H. Koike, A. Shiraki, K. Takuma, H. Kamei, Y. Noda, A.Nitta, T. Nabeshima, Y. Yoneda, K. YamadaNeurosci. Res., 64 (2009), pp. 297-305
G.W. Konat, B.E. Lally, A.A. Toth, A.K. SalmMetab. Brain Dis., 26 (2011), pp. 237-240
S.J. Spencer, J.G. Heida, Q.J. PittmanBehav. Brain Res., 164 (2005), pp. 231-238
L. Tomljenovic, R.L. Blaylock, C.A. ShawAutism spectrum disorders and aluminum vaccine adjuvantsV.B. Patel, V.R. Preedy, C.R. Martin (Eds.), Comprehensive Guide to Autism, New York, Springer(2014), pp. 1585-1609
M. Mold, E. Shardlow, C. ExleySci Rep, 6 (2016), Article 31578
M.R. Herbert, J.P. Russo, S. Yang, J. Roohi, M. Blaxill, S.G. Kahler, L. Cremer, E. HatchwellNeurotoxicology, 27 (2006), pp. 671-684
K. Suzuki, G. Sugihara, Y. Ouchi, K. Nakamura, M. Tsujii, M. Futatsubashi, Y. Iwata, K.J. Tsuchiya, K. Matsumoto, K. Takebayashi, T. Wakuda, Y. Yoshihara, S. Suda, M. Kikuchi, N. Takei, T.Sugiyama, T. Irie, N. MoriArch. Gen. Psychiatry, 68 (2011), pp. 306-313
Y. Qiu, Y. Peng, J. WangAdv. Neuroimmunol., 6 (1996), pp. 223-231
E.M. SternbergNat. Rev. Immunol., 6 (2006), pp. 318-328
J.R. Schoenborn, C.B. WilsonAdv. Immunol., 96 (2007), pp. 41-101
N. Parameswaran, S. PatialCrit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr., 20 (2010), pp. 87-103
Y. Liao, X.L. Qi, Y. Cao, W.F. Yu, R. Ravid, B. Winblad, J.J. Pei, Z.Z. GuanCurr. Alzheimer Res., 13 (2016), pp. 1290-1301
Z. Sun, R. AnderssonShock, 18 (2002), pp. 99-106
P. Viatour, M.P. Merville, V. Bours, A. ChariotTrends Biochem. Sci., 30 (2005), pp. 43-52
G. Diamant, R. DiksteinBiochim. Biophys. Acta, 1829 (2013), pp. 937-945
J.S. Tilstra, C.L. Clauson, L.J. Niedernhofer, P.D. RobbinsAging Dis, 2 (2011), pp. 449-465
G. Bonizzi, M. KarinTrends Immunol., 25 (2004), pp. 280-288
J.L. Cheshire, A.S. Baldwin Jr.Mol. Cell. Biol., 17 (1997), pp. 6746-6754
D.G. Amaral, C.M. Schumann, C.W. NordahlTrends Neurosci., 31 (2008), pp. 137-145
R. Stoner, M.L. Chow, M.P. Boyle, S.M. Sunkin, P.R. Mouton, S. Roy, A. Wynshaw-Boris, S.A.Colamarino, E.S. Lein, E. CourchesneN. Engl. J. Med., 370 (2014), pp. 1209-1219
W.J. LukiwJ. Inorg. Biochem., 104 (2010), pp. 1010-1012
W.J. Lukiw, T.P. Kruck, D.R. McLachlanFEBS Lett., 253 (1989), pp. 59-62
J. Wu, F. Du, P. Zhang, I.A. Khan, J. Chen, Y. LiangJ. Inorg. Biochem., 99 (2005), pp. 1145-1154
D.R.C. McLachlan, W.J. Lukiw, T.P.A. KruckEnviron. Geochem. Health, 12 (1990), pp. 103-114
W.J. Lukiw, H.J. LeBlanc, L.A. Carver, D.R. McLachlan, N.G. BazanJ. Mol. Neurosci., 11 (1998), pp. 67-78
P.N. Alexandrov, Y. Zhao, A.I. Pogue, M.A. Tarr, T.P. Kruck, M.E. Percy, J.G. Cui, W.J. LukiwJ. Alzheimers Dis., 8 (2005), pp. 117-127
W.J. Lukiw, M.E. Percy, T.P. KruckJ. Inorg. Biochem., 99 (2005), pp. 1895-1898
W.J. Lukiw, N.G. BazanNeurochem. Res., 25 (2000), pp. 1173-1184
A. Chauhan, V. Chauhan, W.T. Brown, I. CohenLife Sci., 75 (2004), pp. 2539-2549
A. Chauhan, V. ChauhanPathophysiology, 13 (2006), pp. 171-181
P. Ashwood, P. Krakowiak, I. Hertz-Picciotto, R. Hansen, I.N. Pessah, J. Van de WaterBrain Behav. Immun., 25 (2011), pp. 840-849
E.M. Sajdel-Sulkowska, M. Xu, W. McGinnis, N. KoibuchiCerebellum, 10 (2011), pp. 43-48
I. Tonhajzerova, I. Ondrejka, M. Mestanik, P. Mikolka, I. Hrtanek, A. Mestanikova, I. Bujnakova, D.MokraAdv. Exp. Med. Biol., 861 (2015), pp. 93-98
I. Hertz-Picciotto, H.Y. Park, M. Dostal, A. Kocan, T. Trnovec, R. SramBasic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 102 (2008), pp. 146-154
P. Ashwood, J. Van de WaterClin. Dev. Immunol., 11 (2004), pp. 165-174
P. Ashwood, A. Enstrom, P. Krakowiak, I. Hertz-Picciotto, R.L. Hansen, L.A. Croen, S. Ozonoff, I.N.Pessah, J. Van de WaterJ. Neuroimmunol., 204 (2008), pp. 149-153
M.G. Chez, T. Dowling, P.B. Patel, P. Khanna, M. KominskyPediatr. Neurol., 36 (2007), pp. 361-365
H.O. Besedovsky, A.D. ReyBrain cytokines as integrators of the immune–neuroendocrine networkA. Lajtha, H.O. Besedovsky, A. Galoyan (Eds.), Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology, Springer (2008), pp. 3-17
H.O. Besedovsky, A. del ReyNeurochem. Res., 36 (2010), pp. 1-6
L. Fourgeaud, L.M. BoulangerEur. J. Neurosci., 32 (2010), pp. 207-217
G. Anderson, M. MaesProg. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 42 (2013), pp. 5-19
T. Nagae, K. Araki, Y. Shimoda, L.I. Sue, T.G. Beach, Y. KonishiJ Clin Cell Immunol, 7 (2016)
S.M. Allan, N.J. RothwellNat. Rev. Neurosci., 2 (2001), pp. 734-744
S.M. AllanAnn. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 917 (2000), pp. 84-93
L.M. BoulangerNeuron, 64 (2009), pp. 93-109
N.D. PerkinsTrends Cell Biol., 14 (2004), pp. 64-69
H.L. PahlOncogene, 18 (1999), pp. 6853-6866
H. Fan, B. Sun, Q. Gu, A. Lafond-Walker, S. Cao, L.C. BeckerAm. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 282 (2002), pp. H1778-1786
R.H. Shih, C.Y. Wang, C.M. YangFront. Mol. Neurosci., 8 (2015), p. 77
Y. Yamamoto, R.B. GaynorCurr. Mol. Med., 1 (2001), pp. 287-296
B. Hoesel, J.A. SchmidMol. Cancer, 12 (2013), p. 86
W.J. LukiwAlzheimers Res. Ther., 4 (2012), p. 47
W.M. Snow, B.C. AlbensiFront. Mol. Neurosci., 9 (2016), p. 118
R. Pal, P.C. Tiwari, R. Nath, K.K. PantNeurol. Res., 38 (2016), pp. 1111-1122
S.M. Leibowitz, J. YanFront. Mol. Neurosci., 9 (2016), p. 84
R. Donadelli, M. Abbate, C. Zanchi, D. Corna, S. Tomasoni, A. Benigni, G. Remuzzi, C. ZojaAm. J. Kidney Dis., 36 (2000), pp. 1226-1241
A. Sica, L. Dorman, V. Viggiano, M. Cippitelli, P. Ghosh, N. Rice, H.A. YoungJ. Biol. Chem., 272 (1997), pp. 30412-30420
J. Bachevalier, K.A. LovelandNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 30 (2006), pp. 97-117
R.R. Girgis, N.J. Minshew, N.M. Melhem, J.J. Nutche, M.S. Keshavan, A.Y. HardanProg. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 31 (2007), pp. 41-45
M.K. Belmonte, G. Allen, A. Beckel-Mitchener, L.M. Boulanger, R.A. Carper, S.J. WebbJ. Neurosci., 24 (2004), pp. 9228-9231
M.A. Just, V.L. Cherkassky, T.A. Keller, N.J. MinshewBrain, 127 (2004), pp. 1811-1821
S.I. Deutsch, M.R. Urbano, S.A. Neumann, J.A. Burket, E. KatzClin. Neuropharmacol., 33 (2010), pp. 114-120
G. Karvat, T. KimchiNeuropsychopharmacology, 39 (2014), pp. 831-840
- E.B. Mukaetova-Ladinska, J. Westwood, E.K. Perry.
J.H. Yoo, M.G. Valdovinos, D.C. WilliamsJ. Autism Dev. Disord., 37 (2007), pp. 1883-1901
Y.S. Mineur, A. Obayemi, M.B. Wigestrand, G.M. Fote, C.A. Calarco, A.M. Li, M.R. PicciottoProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110 (2013), pp. 3573-3578
N. George, R.J. Dolan, G.R. Fink, G.C. Baylis, C. Russell, J. DriverNat. Neurosci., 2 (1999), pp. 574-580
H.D. Critchley, E.M. Daly, E.T. Bullmore, S.C. Williams, T. Van Amelsvoort, D.M. Robertson, A.Rowe, M. Phillips, G. McAlonan, P. Howlin, D.G. MurphyBrain, 123 (Pt 11) (2000), pp. 2203-2212
P. Bentley, J. Driver, R.J. DolanBrain, 132 (2009), pp. 2356-2371
C.M. Thiel, R.N. Henson, R.J. DolanNeuropsychopharmacology, 27 (2002), pp. 282-292
K. Pierce, E. RedcayBiol. Psychiatry, 64 (2008), pp. 552-560
I.A. van Kooten, S.J. Palmen, P. von Cappeln, H.W. Steinbusch, H. Korr, H. Heinsen, P.R. Hof, H.van Engeland, C. SchmitzBrain, 131 (2008), pp. 987-999
H. Wang, M. Yu, M. Ochani, C.A. Amella, M. Tanovic, S. Susarla, J.H. Li, H. Wang, H. Yang, L.Ulloa, Y. Al-Abed, C.J. Czura, K.J. TraceyNature, 421 (2003), pp. 384-388
C.N. Metz, K.J. TraceyNat. Immunol., 6 (2005), pp. 756-757
D.J. van Westerloo, I.A. Giebelen, S. Florquin, J. Daalhuisen, M.J. Bruno, A.F. de Vos, K.J. Tracey, T. van der PollJ Infect Dis, 191 (2005), pp. 2138-2148
W.J. de Jonge, E.P. van der Zanden, F.O. The, M.F. Bijlsma, D.J. van Westerloo, R.J. Bennink, H.R.Berthoud, S. Uematsu, S. Akira, R.M. van den Wijngaard, G.E. BoeckxstaensNat. Immunol., 6 (2005), pp. 844-851
Y.T. Xiao, J. Wang, W. Lu, Y. Cao, W. CaiCell Death Dis., 7 (2016), Article e2521
Y. Gnatek, G. Zimmerman, Y. Goll, N. Najami, H. Soreq, A. FriedmanFront. Mol. Neurosci., 5 (2012), p. 66
M.A. Kokoszka, P.E. McGoldrick, M. La Vega-Talbott, H. Raynes, C.A. Palmese, S.M. Wolf, C.L.Harden, S. GhatanJ. Neurosurg. Pediatr. (2016), pp. 1-12
M. Olczak, M. Duszczyk, P. Mierzejewski, K. Meyza, M.D. MajewskaBehav. Brain Res., 223 (2011), pp. 107-118
M. Hornig, D. Chian, W.I. LipkinMol. Psychiatry, 9 (2004), pp. 833-845
L. Shi, S.H. Fatemi, R.W. Sidwell, P.H. PattersonJ. Neurosci., 23 (2003), pp. 297-302
J.G. DoreaNeurochem. Res., 36 (2011), pp. 927-938
E. Passeri, C. Villa, M. Couette, E. Itti, P. Brugieres, P. Cesaro, R.K. Gherardi, A.C. Bachoud-Levi, F.J. AuthierJ. Inorg. Biochem., 105 (2011), pp. 1457-1463
M. Couette, M.F. Boisse, P. Maison, P. Brugieres, P. Cesaro, X. Chevalier, R.K. Gherardi, A.C.Bachoud-Levi, F.J. AuthierJ. Inorg. Biochem., 103 (2009), pp. 1571-1578
Y. Shoenfeld, N. Agmon-LevinJ. Autoimmun., 36 (2011), pp. 4-8
P.L. MeroniJ. Autoimmun., 36 (2010), pp. 1-3
J.R. WaltonNeurotoxicology, 30 (2009), pp. 182-193
Y. Zafrir, N. Agmon-Levin, Z. Paz, T. Shilton, Y. ShoenfeldLupus, 21 (2012), pp. 146-152
D. Sienkiewicz, W. Kułak, B. Okurowska-Zawada, G. Paszko-PatejProg Health Sci, 2 (2012), pp. 129-141
A.D. Cohen, Y. ShoenfeldJ. Autoimmun., 9 (1996), pp. 699-703
L. Tomljenovic, C.A. ShawLupus, 21 (2012), pp. 223-230
L. Tomljenovic, C.A. ShawJ. Inorg. Biochem., 105 (2011), pp. 1489-1499
S.F. Maier, L.R. WatkinsPsychol. Rev., 105 (1998), pp. 83-107
R.M. Barrientos, M.G. Frank, L.R. Watkins, S.F. MaierHorm. Behav., 62 (2012), pp. 219-227
R. Dantzer, K.W. KelleyBrain Behav. Immun., 21 (2007), pp. 153-160
M.G. Frank, Z.D. Miguel, L.R. Watkins, S.F. MaierBrain Behav. Immun., 24 (2009), pp. 19-30
F. Pitossi, A. del Rey, A. Kabiersch, H. BesedovskyJ. Neurosci. Res., 48 (1997), pp. 287-298
X. Du, B. Fleiss, H. Li, B. D’Angelo, Y. Sun, C. Zhu, H. Hagberg, O. Levy, C. Mallard, X. WangPLoS One, 6 (2011), Article e19583
S.D. Bilbo, J.W. Rudy, L.R. Watkins, S.F. MaierBehav. Brain Res., 169 (2006), pp. 39-47
S.D. Bilbo, L.H. Levkoff, J.H. Mahoney, L.R. Watkins, J.W. Rudy, S.F. MaierBehav. Neurosci., 119 (2005), pp. 293-301
S.D. Bilbo, J.C. Biedenkapp, A. Der-Avakian, L.R. Watkins, J.W. Rudy, S.F. MaierJ. Neurosci., 25 (2005), pp. 8000-8009
M.A. Galic, K. Riazi, J.G. Heida, A. Mouihate, N.M. Fournier, S.J. Spencer, L.E. Kalynchuk, G.C.Teskey, Q.J. PittmanJ. Neurosci., 28 (2008), pp. 6904-6913
S.J. Spencer, N.P. Hyland, K.A. Sharkey, Q.J. PittmanAm. J. Phys. Regul. Integr. Comp. Phys., 292 (2007), pp. R308-315
R. Tuchman, I. RapinLancet Neurol., 1 (2002), pp. 352-358
A.E. Purcell, O.H. Jeon, A.W. Zimmerman, M.E. Blue, J. PevsnerNeurology, 57 (2001), pp. 1618-1628
J.S. Gerber, P.A. OffitClin. Infect. Dis., 48 (2009), pp. 456-461
B. Conti, I. Tabarean, C. Andrei, T. BartfaiFront. Biosci., 9 (2004), pp. 1433-1449
C.A. DinarelloJ Infect Dis, 179 (Suppl. 2) (1999), pp. S294-304
H.O. Besedovsky, A.D. ReyBrain Behav. Immun., 21 (2007), pp. 34-44
A.S. McKee, M.W. Munks, M.K. MacLeod, C.J. Fleenor, N. Van Rooijen, J.W. Kappler, P. MarrackJ. Immunol., 183 (2009), pp. 4403-4414
F. Mosca, E. Tritto, A. Muzzi, E. Monaci, F. Bagnoli, C. Iavarone, D. O’Hagan, R. Rappuoli, E. De GregorioProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105 (2008), pp. 10501-10506
R.K. Gherardi, M. Coquet, P. Cherin, L. Belec, P. Moretto, P.A. Dreyfus, J.F. Pellissier, P. Chariot, F.J. AuthierBrain, 124 (2001), pp. 1821-1831
C.A. Shaw, S. Sheth, D. Li, L. TomljenovicOA Autism, 2 (2014), p. 11
J.W. OlneyNeurotoxicology, 23 (2002), pp. 659-668
M.V. JohnstonBrain Dev., 17 (1995), pp. 301-306
L. Melendez, D. Santos, L. Luna Polido, M.L. Mendes, S. Sella, L.Q. Caldas, E. Silva-FilhoClin. Exp. Pharmacol., 3 (2013)
H. Yasuda, T. TsutsuiInt. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10 (2013), pp. 6027-6043
M.M. McCarthy, A.P. Arnold, G.F. Ball, J.D. Blaustein, G.J. De VriesJ. Neurosci., 32 (2012), pp. 2241-2247
T.L. BaleNeuron, 64 (2009), pp. 13-16
N. Izquierdo-Useros, M. Naranjo-Gomez, I. Erkizia, M.C. Puertas, F.E. Borras, J. Blanco, J.Martinez-PicadoPLoS Pathog., 6 (2010), Article e1000740
T. Laskus, M. Radkowski, D.M. Adair, J. Wilkinson, A.C. Scheck, J. RakelaAIDS, 19 (Suppl. 3) (2005), pp. S140-144
D.B. Dubal, P.M. WiseDialogues Clin. Neurosci., 4 (2002), pp. 149-161
P.M. Wise, D.B. Dubal, M.E. Wilson, S.W. Rau, M. Bo TtnerEndocrinology, 142 (2001), pp. 969-973
T. Kubota, H. Matsumoto, Y. KirinoJ. Pharmacol. Sci., 131 (2016), pp. 219-222
P.M. Wise, D.B. DubalBiol. Reprod., 63 (2000), pp. 982-985
E. Sabbioni, N. Blanch, K. Baricevic, M.-A. SerraBiol Trace El Res, 68 (1999), pp. 107-119