Although the news reporting on this shooting is still in its early stages, there are five strange things that just don’t add up about this massacre (so far). I run through them below.
#1) Dozens of concert-goers reported the presence of multiple shooters
Although law enforcement says there was only one shooter, multiple witnesses are openly reporting the presence of multiple shooters. This could reasonably be the result of confusion and chaos, but it’s also highly suspicious that the shooter had “full auto” weapon which is usually limited to law enforcement or military personnel.
This question about multiple shooters was also raised after the Aurora, Colorado “Batman movie theater” shooting, in which numerous witnesses reported the presence of multiple shooters.
If this shooting was carried out by multiple shooters, it would obviously indicate planning and coordination among a group of people who sought to carry out the shooting for a political purpose of some kind.
#2) Who warned concert-goers they were “all going to die” a full 45 minutes before the shooting started?
Via the UK Express:
One woman, who was at the Route 91 music event, claimed an unidentified woman had told other concert-goers they were “all going to die” after pushing her way to the front of the venue.
The witness, 21, told local news: “She had been messing with a lady in front of her and telling her she was going to die, that we were all going to die.
“They escorted her out to make her stop messing around with all the other people, but none of us knew it was going to be serious.”
She described the lady as Hispanic. The lady was escorted from the venue along with a man.
The unnamed witness, who was attending the event on her 21st birthday, described the pair as short, both around 5 ft 5ins to 5ft 6ins tall, and looked like “everyday people”.
It’s clear that neither of these two people were the shooter, as the shooter is a much taller Caucasian man. Thus, this is not a “lone gunman” massacre. There was coordination. At least three people were aware this shooting was about to take place.
#3) The weapon you hear on videos was FULL AUTO, which is almost impossible to acquire through legal means
The multitude of videos that captured the event clearly indicate that at least one shooter was running a full auto weapons system. Such weapons are almost impossible for “civilians” to acquire. Although some pre-1986 full auto weapons are available for sale, they require extensive ATF documentation, background checks and extremely long wait periods approaching one year. Plus, they tend to cost $25,000 or more, and they’re extremely rare.
Full auto weapons, however, are widely owned by police officers, federal officials and military organizations. It will be very interesting to find out where this weapon came from and how it was acquired.
#4) Why were the exits blocked, trapping victims like rats in a maze?
Numerous reports from witnesses who were on the scene reveal that nearly all the exits were blocked. One witness described the situation as “being caught like a rate in a maze” with numerous “dead ends.”
Why were nearly all the exits blocked? In essence, the concert created a kill zone that amplified the casualties. So far, according to the Clark County Sheriff in Vegas, 515 people have been injured and 59 people have so far died. These are unthinkable numbers, approaching war-time casualty counts. It’s clear from the coverage that this shockingly high body count would not have been possible if people had been free to flee the concert venue.
In essence, the concert trapped the people, preventing them from escaping, and denying them the ability to seek cover. From there, sustained, full-auto gunfire is almost impossible to survive.
In addition, once the shooting started, the stage lights were turned to the crowd, lighting up the crowd and making them an easier target for the shooter(s). Was this deliberate?
#5) Why did the shooter have as many as 10 firearms in his room?
According to news reports, the shooter — identified as Stephen Paddock — had as many as 10 firearms in his room, including several rifles. If he was the only shooter, what’s the point of having so many rifles? One man can obviously only shoot one rifle, and since he had a full auto rifle, he could obviously achieve his evil aims by focusing on his one rifle. There was no need for him to have multiple rifles.
So were the other rifles brought to the room to “stage” the crime scene with an abundance of guns? Why would one elderly man bother to carry 8 – 10 weapons to a hotel room in the first place? That’s a lot of work. Rifles aren’t lightweight devices.
I find the idea that a lone, elderly man would carry so many rifles to a hotel room for no practical reason to be highly suspicious. It makes no sense at all.
ONE MORE QUESTION: Why is ISIS claiming responsibility for the Las Vegas massacre?
Islamic State has claimed responsibility for a shooting that killed at least 50 people and wounded over 400 in Las Vegas early on Monday, and said the attacker had converted to Islam a few months ago.
“The Las Vegas attack was carried out by a soldier of the Islamic State and he carried it out in response to calls to target states of the coalition,” the group’s news agency Amaq said in reference to the U.S.-led coalition fighting the group in the Middle East.
“The Las Vegas attacker converted to Islam a few months ago,” Amaq added. (Reporting by Ali Abdelaty; Writing by Arwa Gaballa; Editing by Ahmed Aboulenein)
‘It’s all hogwash. The “official” narrative of how things went down in the Las Vegas massacre is so full of holes that it begs the question of just how deep the truth about this attack really goes.
What we know for sure is that, yes, 59 people were killed (so far) and hundreds were wounded. This wasn’t a “hoax” shooting — people actually were shot, wounded and killed (and our prayers go out to all their families for this horrific tragedy). Yet the official narrative that claims Stephen Paddock — a retired, 64-year-old accountant with absolutely no firearms training, no gun experience and no physical stamina — was somehow able to expertly wield a highly complex (and physically demanding) weapon system for 10 sustained minutes is total nonsense.
Even highly trained Navy Seals would have a difficult time running a full auto weapon for 10 minutes straight. Such weapon systems are brutal on the operator. They require tremendous strength, stamina and expert troubleshooting to keep running. Full-auto weapons overheat and jam. They demand incredible strength to keep aimed on target. They require expert reloading and weapons clearing in the case of jams, and the hotel room would have been so full of smoke and powder residue that it would be almost impossible to keep breathing from that enclosed space.’
Could another shooter have been on the ground inside the venue? New video footage suggests so.
A video clip taken from the ground just as all hell broke loose at the Las Vegas shooting this weekend is raising some serious questions about multiple shooters. Captured in the midst of a random live stream and discovered by Twitter user Brian Richmond, is what appears to be a shooter within the music venue. It looks as if he fired his weapon straight into the crowd.
Brian Richmond tweeted: “This is no doubt a man on the ground dumping on the crowd!!!”
Have a look at the clip below and make sure you give it a critical eye when it is replayed in slow motion. This footage is consistent with witness testimony by dozens of concert-goers who claim they saw multiple shooters. This is a theory many others are adopting in the wake of countless factors that do not add up within the official narrative.
— 🇺🇸Brian Richmond (@B_Rich33NO) October 4, 2017
An anonymous post on 4chan seemed to predict a shooting in Las Vegas weeks before Stephen Paddock shot dead 59 people and injured hundreds more last Sunday night.
The posts in the /pol/ forum, which were signed ‘John’, speak of revealing ‘a little secret’ before warning readers to stay away from large groups in Las Vegas.
The anonymous poster then went on to describe the ‘high incident project’ aimed at making sure the ‘American public think that places with extremely high security aren’t safe’ to create increased regulation.
The posts read:
Look I feel bad for some of you on this website so I’ll let you in on a little secret.
If you live in Las Vegas or Henderson stay inside tomorrow. Don’t go anywhere where there are large groups of people.
Also if you see three blacks [sic] vans parked next to each other immediately leave the area. You’re Welcome. – John
It’s called the ‘high incident project’. They want to make the American public think that places with extremely high security aren’t safe.
They are trying to create more regulations. You will see law proposed within the next few years to put up more metal detectors and other security devices.
Media and politicians will be saying places with lots of police need even more police. I can’t guarantee anything will happen tomorrow but Las Vegas is on their minds.
The final post reads:
If their plan is successful, state of Nevada will pass a law in the future making all casinos have mandatory metal detectors and backscatter machines, soon after a federal law will be passed to put these machines in universities, high schools, federal buildings, you name it.
OSI systems and Chertoff are the main producers of these machines. Sometime around 2020 Chertoff and OSI will merge into a single company. After they merge the owners will sell off all their stock and make billions in profit. Mr Chertoff has been in contact with Sheldon Adelson.
Mr Adelson will become a huge sponsor of these machines and he will be the first to put them in his casinos when the law passes. This is my last message for now. Don’t expect me to return anytime soon.
Paddock, using an automatic weapon, is thought to have shot at the crowd of 22,000 people enjoying the Route 91 Harvest country music festival from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel before shooting himself.
The final message predicts the increase in metal detectors throughout buildings such as casinos and schools, before signing off ‘don’t expect me to return anytime soon’.
The post was uploaded to 4chan on Sunday September 10 – three weeks before the terrifying incident which became the deadliest shooting in US history.
The 4chan messages were posted on Twitter by ‘political strategist’ Mike Tokes who earlier posted leaked images showing the body of Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock lying in his hotel room, with a note placed close by.
Paddock can be seen surrounded by an assortment of weapons and shell casings including a bipod mounted rifle by his feet as well as a blood stained revolver lying close by.
At least two had been modified to allow for something close to fully-automatic fire, using a legal ‘bump stock’ style device that helps the recoil accelerate how quickly the shooter can pull the trigger.
On a nearby side table, there appears to be a note which could perhaps offer an insight into Paddock’s thinking before the massacre took place.
We have contacted Las Vegas Metropolitan Police for more information on the note.
The Las Vegas massacre, which has been dubbed the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, presents a new set of challenges and questions for Americans—but many politicians and celebrities are using it to make the usual calls for gun control.
The shooting left 59 people dead and 527 injured, and the official story is that it was carried out by Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old man whose life is missing all of the qualities that make up the profile of a typical mass shooter. Among a number of glaring inconsistencies, Paddock appears to have been a happy, rich, retired man. Along with his actions in the days leading up to the shooting, the idea that he transported 23 firearms and thousands of rounds of ammunition up to his hotel room—and it went unnoticed by the hotel’s cleaning service for days—simply does not add up.
However, instead of pursuing justice for the victims by searching for answers that go beyond the official narrative of how the shooting occurred, a number of politicians and celebrities have responded by calling for gun control.
Hillary Clinton wasted no time in politicizing the tragedy, taking to Twitter just hours after the shooting occurred, to write that Americans should “stand up to the NRA” in the exact same Tweet that she wrote Americans “must put politics aside.”
The crowd fled at the sound of gunshots.
Imagine the deaths if the shooter had a silencer, which the NRA wants to make easier to get.
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein shared similar sentiments, criticizing “easy access to weapons and ammunition” before the majority of the details on the shooting had even been released.
While it is not surprising to hear politicians calling for gun control, their thoughts have been shared by voices in the mainstream media. Hayley Geftman-Gold, a top legal executive at CBS, wrote on Facebook that she was “actually not even sympathetic bc country music fans often are Republican gun toters.”
A number of celebrities have also joined the chorus. Late night TV show host Jimmy Kimmel gave a tearful monologue claiming that Congress “should be praying for God to forgive them for letting the gun lobby run this country.”
“When someone with a beard attacks us, we tap phones, we invoke travel bans, we build walls, we take every possible precaution to make sure it doesn’t happen again,” Kimmel said. “But when an American buys a gun and kills other Americans, then there’s nothing we can do about that. And the Second Amendment, I guess, our forefathers wanted us to have AK-47s is the argument, I assume.”
Pop singer Ariana Grande also called for gun control, and for “people to look at this and call this what it is = terrorism.” While Grande is correct in stating that it was an act of terrorism—which many government officials and media figures failed to acknowledge—it should be noted that earlier this year, 22 people were reportedly killed in a bombing outside of her concert in Manchester, UK. Even with strict gun control regulations already in place, an individual with evil intentions was able to carry out an attack that resulted in mass casualties.
Caleb Keeter, a guitarist for the Josh Abbott Band who was at the Route 91 Music Festival when the shooting occurred, claimed the tragedy made him change his mind on gun control.
“I’ve been a proponent of the 2nd Amendment my entire life. Until the events of last night, I cannot express how wrong I was,” Keeter proclaimed on Twitter in a screenshot of a message that concluded, “We need gun control. RIGHT. NOW.”
The thing is, while Keeter is correct in stating that a man with a handgun on the ground is no match for a man who was reportedly on the 32nd floor of a building with an automatic rifle—that does not mean that individuals who carry concealed weapons do not have the opportunity to defend themselves on a daily basis.
It was reported on Tuesday that police found ammonium nitrate, the same material used to kill 168 people in the Oklahoma City bombing, in Paddock’s car. Had he chosen to or been able to deploy an explosive device using this material inside a crowd as large as the one at Route 91, the death toll would’ve catastrophically higher than what it was—and no gun would’ve been necessary.
The families and friends of 59 individuals are currently mourning the tragic loss of their loved ones. The families and friends of hundreds of individuals are waiting for the results from surgeries, and preparing for the ways in which the injuries their loved ones have sustained will affect them for the rest of their lives.
The fact that instead of pursuing justice for the victims of the Las Vegas massacre by searching for the truth and questioning the inconsistencies in the official narrative, influential politicians, celebrities, and media figures have instead resorted to calling for gun control, is both disheartening and blatantly irresponsible.
A few internet sleuths have taken matters into their own hands after the obvious disinformation campaign by the mainstream media surrounding the Las Vegas shooting. Mounting evidence of what looks like a false flag is worrying many. And once you read this, those fears will be shoved into overdrive.
On the surface, the tweet doesn’t say much. But how much can Mike Toke really say in a limited amount of characters? But what he does manage is enough to get anyone seeking the truth to follow all these leads and look into everything that the media and our government continues to hide from us. It’s what’s embedded in the tweet that counts.
Looking closely, the first thing you will notice is that the shooter, Stephen Paddock, had a pilot license and owned two planes. This is well-established fact. The tail number of one of those planes is N5343M, a Cirrus SR-20. You can see that this was owned by Paddock by going to the website Flightaware.com. But Paddock doesn’t own this plane anymore. It was grounded three years ago, and it’s now in the hands of none other than Volant LLC, which there is little information on.
However, Volant Associates is none other than a Department of Defense contractor. Meaning Paddock’s plane has been in the hands of the United States government for the past three years and grounded since – if Volant LLC is being used as a way to hide information. Considering what Volant Associates does, that wouldn’t be so far fetched. But the plane’s information is all easily verified here on Flightaware.com. It’s been in Roanoke, Virginia since April 25, 2014.
Volant’s describes it’s mission on their website as providing “the industry’s preeminent professionals to discriminating U.S. government and intelligence-and-defense-industry customers.”
The registration of this plane is also listed as “active” even though it hasn’t been flown in three years. Strange enough yet? Well, it gets even better. The FAA should have this same information. But they don’t. Their website shows that a different aircraft, a Cessna 152, maintains that tail number and it was last registered to a person in San Diego, California. The FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) is a government agency, and it appears that it has scrubbed this plane’s information. Now, why would they do that? Well, the plot still thickens.
There is little to be known about Volant LLC., in Roanoke, Virginia. A company big enough to have a plane should have a website, at least that would be the assumption. But a Google search netted very little information other than they provide “business services.” But Volant Associates is a completely different matter. That’s your defense contractor. And their website says they are located in Chantilly, VA, which wouldn’t be too far from Volant LLC. in Roanoke. And a quick Google search of that verifies that thetwo cities are only 219 miles apart. So is Volant LLC., a cover company for the defense contractor? Is this a coincidence?
For a list of all of the contracts between Volant LLC. and the government, click here. They have worked for the Obama Administration. Could Paddock’s plane have been used in other scandals, such as the Fast and Furious gun running scheme? Who knows, and at this point, we may never know.
What all this means is entirely speculation right now. But isn’t is strange that this information is being kept from the public, and those who seek the truth are stuck finding it on their own?
Interesting Correlations Obama coup in Kiev, Ukraine: The Maidan Snipers
acted alone. Take This Each Morning & Flush Away 12 Kg for Only $4 Smart Consumer Life Sponsored by Revcontent Read More > 62,233 Speaking to the Courier Mail, Brian Hodge said he managed to escape the initial horrific scenes inside the hotel but found himself forced to hide in a bush for several hours after the event.“I got outside safely and was hiding in bushes,” Mr. Hodge said. “There were multiple people dead and multiple shooters. “I was just hiding waiting for police to come get us.”“We were hiding in the bushes outside waiting for the police.” Mr. Hodge said he was staying in room 32134 while the gunman was in room 32135.“It was a machine gun from the room next to me,” he said. “My floor is a crime scene. They killed a security guard on my floor.”Mr. Hodge reported that one gunman was in the room next to his, but other gunmen were also operating on the same floor. This account seems to explain the images taken from outside the Mandalay Bay Hotel, where the gunfire came from, that clearly shows two smashed windows from two different hotel rooms on the same floor. READ MORE: False Flag: Las Vegas Shooter Who Killed 50 People ‘Wasn’t Alone’The mainstream media claims that Paddock was using multiple hotel rooms to shoot from, but why would they ignore the statements from eyewitnesses who saw multiple gunmen operating on the same floor?Why is the MSM so keen to push the “crazy gun-owner” narrative on the public..?Aside from the witness statement that completely scratches the lone-gunman theory, multiple reports have also emerged from outside the hotel that gunfire was coming from more than one floor of the hotel.Social media has been flooded with video uploads filmed by witnesses that show gunshots emanating from a 4th-floor window as well as two 32nd floor windows.SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEOVideos of the 4th-floor shooter are being taken down by Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as quickly as they are being uploaded, but why is evidence of the additional attackers being so desperately covered-up? © press Two different hotel rooms were used by gunmen on the same floor Another Australian witness says she and her husband were sat in the bar of the Luxor Hotel when they saw a heavily armed man dressed as security guard ran through the hotel being chased by the hotel’s real security team.Speaking to Australian news outlet Courier Mail, Wendy Miller from Cooroy, on the Sunshine Coast, described the moment she was caught up on the attack when the “man of interest” ran past her.“We managed to make our way back to our room…” she told The Courier Mail. “We are in lockdown.“Our door is deadlocked and a chair against the door.”Ms. Miller said the man sprinted through her hotel after coming off an escalator from the Mandalay Bay.“The man that they [security] were chasing was wearing a security jacket like them,” she said.Of course, there’s no mention of any of these events in the corporate owned mainstream media in the US.Why would this clear evidence, that points to a team of operatives carrying out a carefully planned attack, be completely ignored? READ MORE: Las Vegas False Flag: FBI Confirms Shooter Was an Antifa MemberThe MSM is focused on convincing the public that the devastation was caused by a crazy lone gunman and that the only answer is to change the United States Constitution.If the mainstream news was meant to truthfully report events to the people, then this information would be all over every television set in America, but it isn’t.The “news” is nothing more than a propaganda tool used by the political elite to push an agenda onto the masses.This is another perfect example of “problem, reaction, solution”. Problem: “Crazy gun-owner” has too many right and ends up shooting hundreds of people in a horric masacre.Reaction: The MSM reports the “official narrative” leaving the public angry and demanding a solution.Solution: Take away the rights of American people in the name of “safetly”.A quick look at the “real news” on TV or a search on Google’s heavily censored news feed and you can see this already being played out in the media.Only hours after the attack, Hillary Clinton has already called for a change in gun law demanding people “stand up to the NRA” to “stop this from happening again”.Whether you are for or against gun laws in America, one thing the people must always hold precious is the United States Constitution.Once the oligarchs get their sticky fingers all over those sacred amendments, the American people can kiss goodbye to their civil liberties forever.